Fine article, indeed!
Roger G. Moore
-Original Message-
From: Jim Kennedy jkenn...@batcon.org
To: CaveTex texascavers@texascavers.com; Allan Cobb a...@kihikihi.com; Andy
Gluesenkamp a...@gluesenkamp.com; Ann Scott mayaca...@mail.utexas.edu; Bill
Russell whruss...@gmail.com; Butch
Agreed. Nice that the cave moved up in the long and deep
cave lists, although they must have been using an out-of-date deep
list, since at the old depth of 24 m it would have been nowhere near
65th, but rather less than 126th, the limit of the list at
, 2012 9:56 AM
To: texascavers@texascavers.com; bfra...@maverickgrotto.org
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] nice article on recent exploration in Phantom
Springs Cave
Agreed. Nice that the cave moved up in the long and deep
cave lists, although they must have been using an out-of-date deep
list
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ralph [mailto:ronra...@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 10:05 AM
To: 'Mark Minton'; texascavers@texascavers.com; bfra...@maverickgrotto.org
Subject: RE: [Texascavers] nice article on recent exploration in Phantom
Springs Cave
And while we are nit
Fine article, indeed!
Roger G. Moore
-Original Message-
From: Jim Kennedy jkenn...@batcon.org
To: CaveTex texascavers@texascavers.com; Allan Cobb a...@kihikihi.com; Andy
Gluesenkamp a...@gluesenkamp.com; Ann Scott mayaca...@mail.utexas.edu; Bill
Russell whruss...@gmail.com; Butch
Agreed. Nice that the cave moved up in the long and deep
cave lists, although they must have been using an out-of-date deep
list, since at the old depth of 24 m it would have been nowhere near
65th, but rather less than 126th, the limit of the list at
, 2012 9:56 AM
To: texascavers@texascavers.com; bfra...@maverickgrotto.org
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] nice article on recent exploration in Phantom
Springs Cave
Agreed. Nice that the cave moved up in the long and deep
cave lists, although they must have been using an out-of-date deep
list
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ralph [mailto:ronra...@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 10:05 AM
To: 'Mark Minton'; texascavers@texascavers.com; bfra...@maverickgrotto.org
Subject: RE: [Texascavers] nice article on recent exploration in Phantom
Springs Cave
And while we are nit
Fine article, indeed!
Roger G. Moore
-Original Message-
From: Jim Kennedy jkenn...@batcon.org
To: CaveTex texascavers@texascavers.com; Allan Cobb a...@kihikihi.com; Andy
Gluesenkamp a...@gluesenkamp.com; Ann Scott mayaca...@mail.utexas.edu; Bill
Russell whruss...@gmail.com; Butch
Agreed. Nice that the cave moved up in the long and deep
cave lists, although they must have been using an out-of-date deep
list, since at the old depth of 24 m it would have been nowhere near
65th, but rather less than 126th, the limit of the list at
, 2012 9:56 AM
To: texascavers@texascavers.com; bfra...@maverickgrotto.org
Subject: Re: [Texascavers] nice article on recent exploration in Phantom
Springs Cave
Agreed. Nice that the cave moved up in the long and deep
cave lists, although they must have been using an out-of-date deep
list
-Original Message-
From: Ron Ralph [mailto:ronra...@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2012 10:05 AM
To: 'Mark Minton'; texascavers@texascavers.com; bfra...@maverickgrotto.org
Subject: RE: [Texascavers] nice article on recent exploration in Phantom
Springs Cave
And while we are nit
12 matches
Mail list logo
