On Tue 27 Feb 2007, Stacho Mudrak wrote:
> Quoting Mike Lake :
> > Yes orientaion would be good but just flowstone for now with no
> > orientation would be better than nothing.
>
> In the latest snapshot, area flowstone symbol is now supported.
Thanks !
I have recompiled it and now I see flowsto
Quoting Mike Lake :
> while now that we can use this. It means I can now also play around
> varying the mpost code to for the nicest looking flowstone.
There are more symbols in therion, that need to look better. If you
will do these changes in mpost code, we can add those symbols into
standar
On 2007-02-27 22:45 +1100, Mike Lake wrote:
> On Tue 27 Feb 2007, Stacho Mudrak wrote:
> > Quoting Mike Lake :
> > > Yes orientaion would be good but just flowstone for now with no
> > > orientation would be better than nothing.
> >
> > In the latest snapshot, area flowstone symbol is now supporte
Quoting Mike Lake :
> Yes orientaion would be good but just flowstone for now with no
> orientation would be better than nothing.
In the latest snapshot, area flowstone symbol is now supported.
Regards, S.