11.12.2011 4:51, Bruce:
> I don't think I would find that approach useful as in many (most?) cases you
> would need to specify dozens of station pairs. Generally the existing
> syntax is much more compact.
Yes, the existing syntax is good for human, but create difficulties when
I process survey
> What are you think about second behaviour of "flags" command like second
behaviour of "extend"?
Vasily
The examples you give are for shot flags (duplicate, splay) so they always
apply to pairs of stations.
Therefore examples like;
flags duplicate 1 at survey
flags not duplicate 2 at survey
