I also do as Xavier describes, and agree that compass bearing (even if clino
is vertical) seems to be the logical way to orient LRUD.
Bruce
-Original Message-
I completely agree with you that NSEW is not not a good way to measure
the shape of about-vertical passages. In fact I personally
>KML looks fine, as does the lox model.
>I understand that the pit would look like a transparent hole if
>rendered in a map without the lower scrap. Wasn't there are way you
>suggested which might allow toggling the options on a line in
>different maps Bruce? So you could have the pit filled in on
>Orientating to the passage has always been most logical to me, but I do
>see that the above is very valid. However what do you do on a true
>vertical, as it does not have a compass bearing?
I just adopt a compass bearing to suit the general trend of the preceding
passage or to suit the orientat
Le 15/05/2012 23:54, Andrew Atkinson a écrit :
>
>
> On 15/05/12 21:37, Bruce wrote:
>> I also do as Xavier describes, and agree that compass bearing (even
>> if clino
>> is vertical) seems to be the logical way to orient LRUD.
>> Bruce
>
> Orientating to the passage has always been most logical
