/mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20131215/2bb00f14/attachment.html>
It's strange, but I thought that the whole point of pdf was that the
document would present in identical fashion across displays and platforms.
Has anyone tried printing from different rendering engines & seeing in what
ways the results differ?
Screen display is all very well, but if you are
[bloody top-posters - rearranging to make sense]
Footleg [2013-12-15 21:29 +] wrote:
> Wookey wrote:
>> On 15 December 2013 19:30, Bruce <[1]bruce at tomo.co.nz> wrote:
>
>>> [2]http://therion.speleo.sk/wiki/doku.php/contrib:externalviewers#examples_of_r
>>>
_
> Therion mailing list
> Therion at speleo.sk
> http://mailman.speleo.sk/mailman/listinfo/therion
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mailman.speleo.sk/pipermail/therion/attachments/20131215/49f8a9f8/attachment.html>
+++ Bruce [2013-12-14 09:16 +1300]:
>
> >I have just noticed that Adobe Acrobat and the (unnamed) pdf viewer
> currently opening from Firefox on this machine render coloured files very
> differently. It's not just that the tones are different, but, for example,
> in Acrobat boulders and the
