Thanks Duncan and Martin
I was not aware of this distinction between the different (in)visibilities for
wall behaviour.
I'll add it to the wiki page.
-Original Message-
From: Therion [mailto:therion-boun...@speleo.sk] On Behalf Of Duncan Collis via
Therion
Sent: Friday, 17 February 2017
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 10:20:54AM +0200, Benedikt Hallinger via Therion wrote:
> If therion calculates the average position of all fixed points this is fine.
> the cave spans about 5km w/e and about 3km n/s.
Ah, the 100km is total passage length not extent then.
For a few km the variation is pro
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 9:20 AM, Benedikt Hallinger via Therion
wrote:
> If therion calculates the average position of all fixed points this is fine.
> the cave spans about 5km w/e and about 3km n/s.
The change in declination over 5 km distance in your area is about 1'
which is completely negligi
> 18. 2. 2017 v 9:20, Benedikt Hallinger via Therion :
>
> Based on what you have said, i would assume that the problem source lies in
> therion itself summarizing all centreline dates into one survey average date,
> and not just by centerline as i would assume, when each centerline has a date
If therion calculates the average position of all fixed points this is fine.
the cave spans about 5km w/e and about 3km n/s.
I strongly dont think this is the error source as it is also visible in the
test file. Also, calculating the igrf for each station should not be
neccessary unless there ar
