On Wednesday 15 October 2008 22:37:58 David Reiss wrote:
> FWIW, I just received this message from someone at Facebook:
>
> - I was dragged into some other stuff, but as I have a code running under
> twisted, and want to expose data I am collecting via thrift, it is
> important for me. I will go ba
FWIW, I just received this message from someone at Facebook:
- I was dragged into some other stuff, but as I have a code running under
twisted,
and want to expose data I am collecting via thrift, it is important for me.
I will go back to this either this weekend, or early next week.
David Reiss
I feel that this would be acceptable, and that the conflict of interest
would be minor at most.
--David
Terry Jones wrote:
> Hi David
>
>> As to the specific issue of the Twisted patch, this is a pretty significant
>> amount of code that takes some specialized knowledge to review competently.
>>
Hi David
> As to the specific issue of the Twisted patch, this is a pretty significant
> amount of code that takes some specialized knowledge to review competently.
> I know someone who might be able to invest the time to do so, but I think
> contributors are going to have to be patient with such
David Reiss wrote:
I'd be fine with adding more committers, but I'm not convinced that
too few committers is the problem.
More committers is better since it can spread the binding review load
around. While anyone can review a patch, the ability to act on reviews
does motivate folks. Put alt
I've reviewed and commented on or committed a lot of the open bugs
with patches. I'll continue to try to keep this queue short.
Ben Maurer is the other committer with Python expertise. He is also
the only one who knows C#.
I'd be fine with adding more committers, but I'm not convinced that
too
Hi all
> Is there any interest in a commit-fest, where we can work through the
> backlog of patches in an flurry of commits/discards?
Sounds good. We'd be happy to help.
Terry
How many committers do we have that know python? Someone must own that
code, right? I thought the Facebook guys do - dreiss? I can't handle
them since my knowledge is simple at best.
I realize I've got a couple of Ruby patches sitting around that I'll
review tomorrow (156,157).
--
Kevin Clark
h
Is there any interest in a commit-fest, where we can work through the
backlog of patches in an flurry of commits/discards?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 4:16 AM, Esteve Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 October 2008 17:15:43 Bryan Duxbury wrote:
>> I agree that we have a problem. I th
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 17:15:43 Bryan Duxbury wrote:
> I agree that we have a problem. I think that we might need more
> committers, to be honest. There are a lot more libraries than there
> are people in charge at the moment, so clearly any patch that needs
> to get committed will have to go t
I agree that we have a problem. I think that we might need more
committers, to be honest. There are a lot more libraries than there
are people in charge at the moment, so clearly any patch that needs
to get committed will have to go through one of these few people. It
would also be nice to
Hi,
Unfortunately this is typical of most of the issues, and not specific to
Python. Pulling up a list of the issues that have been closed fixed in the
past two months in JIRA [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310800&updated%3Aprevious=-8w&status=5&stat
Hi all!
There are at least half a dozen issues in Jira that relate to Python, all
with patches, but these don't seem to get to the top of the attention stack
for the Thrift team. Is that right? My apologies if not, it's just that a
couple of those patches are things I'd like to be using without ne
13 matches
Mail list logo
