Re: [Thunar-dev] plugin discussion

2005-07-01 Thread Brian J. Tarricone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Benedikt Meurer wrote: > With these interfaces, you can probably add any kind of behaviour that I > can think of (atleast anything that makes sense for Thunar). But > currently, these interfaces aren't finished and as said very often > lately, the

Re: [Thunar-dev] url handlers

2005-07-01 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Ori Bernstein wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:43:13 -0400 > Erik Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > >>And if there is one thing you simply MUST have in the file manager, >>that is outside of Thunar's scope, then write a third party plugin. >> >>Not that a plugin for the VFS is neccessary fo

Re: [Thunar-dev] url handlers

2005-07-01 Thread Ori Bernstein
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:43:13 -0400 Erik Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > And if there is one thing you simply MUST have in the file manager, > that is outside of Thunar's scope, then write a third party plugin. > > Not that a plugin for the VFS is neccessary for 1.0, just that when it > do

Re: [Thunar-dev] plugin discussion

2005-07-01 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Benedikt Meurer wrote: > From my current plan, we have the following interfaces, that can be > implemented by plugins: > > 1) ThunarView > 2) ThunarSidePane > 3) ThunarLocationBar > 4) ThunarFile (not actually an interface, but an abstract base class) > 5) ThunarFolder BTW, writing plugins in C

Re: [Thunar-dev] plugin discussion

2005-07-01 Thread Benedikt Meurer
Brian J. Tarricone wrote: > Hi all, > > Yes, I know it's premature to discuss Thunar plugins at this point, as > there may not even be a plugin interface in 1.0. Having said that, > there's been a lot of unproductive discussion over the past couple weeks > about pet features that people want that

[Thunar-dev] plugin discussion

2005-07-01 Thread Brian J. Tarricone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Yes, I know it's premature to discuss Thunar plugins at this point, as there may not even be a plugin interface in 1.0. Having said that, there's been a lot of unproductive discussion over the past couple weeks about pet features that people

Re: [Thunar-dev] Proposed preferences for Thunar

2005-07-01 Thread Brian J. Tarricone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Biju Chacko wrote: > Brian J. Tarricone wrote: > >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>Biju Chacko wrote: >> >>>Benedikt Meurer wrote: >>> Jaap Karssenberg wrote: >IMHO if you make it look like the gtk filechooser make su

Re: [Thunar-dev] Thumbnails

2005-07-01 Thread Brian J. Tarricone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erik Harrison wrote: > On 6/30/05, Biju Chacko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Benedikt Meurer wrote: >> >>>This would be that we need to remember the chosen view per directory. We >>>can do that, no problem, just the question: Should we actually do it

Re: [Thunar-dev] url handlers

2005-07-01 Thread Erik Harrison
On 6/30/05, Benedikt Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wit Wilinski wrote: > > As for plugins for url handlers, it would be a magnificent idea to have a > > camera:// interface, > > a plugin based on libgphoto2. It would display thumbnails for photos in the > > camera's memory, > > allow for co

Re: [Thunar-dev] Proposed preferences for Thunar

2005-07-01 Thread Erik Harrison
On 7/1/05, Biju Chacko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian J. Tarricone wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Biju Chacko wrote: > > > >>Benedikt Meurer wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Jaap Karssenberg wrote: > >>> > >>> > IMHO if you make it look like the gtk filechooser ma

Re: [Thunar-dev] Thumbnails

2005-07-01 Thread Erik Harrison
On 6/30/05, Biju Chacko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benedikt Meurer wrote: > > This would be that we need to remember the chosen view per directory. We > > can do that, no problem, just the question: Should we actually do it > > that way? > > Absolutely not. Not unless we are providing a spatial