Re: [Thunar-dev] Thunar eating CPU

Olivier Fourdan wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 08:20 +0200, Benedikt Meurer wrote: > >>Do you use inotify then? Check for /dev/inotify and check your kernel >>.config. >> > > > inotify is configured in the kernel, but there is no /dev/inotify > device. /dev/inotify is deprecated, it uses sysca

Re: [Thunar-dev] Fwd: Gnome is trying to decrease memory usage.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/29/2005 10:19 AM, Xiong Jiang wrote: > I am just a user not a programmer of software based on GTK+ but I feel > very sorry if GTK+ is on the track like what you guys expressed in this > thread. I like GTK a lot as I always prefer C over bloated (s

Re: [Thunar-dev] Thunar eating CPU

On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 08:20 +0200, Benedikt Meurer wrote: > Do you use inotify then? Check for /dev/inotify and check your kernel > .config. > inotify is configured in the kernel, but there is no /dev/inotify device. Olivier. ___ Thunar-dev mailing

Re: [Thunar-dev] Fwd: Gnome is trying to decrease memory usage.

I am just a user not a programmer of software based on GTK+ but I feel very sorry if GTK+ is on the track like what you guys expressed in this thread. I like GTK a lot as I always prefer C over bloated (somehow) C++ language. And GTK did very neat work too. I would think that many other people like