yeah, that would be a great feature!
meanwhile, you can create a custom action with this command:
gksu thunar %d
---
Krešimir Špes
Cateia Games
Lead programmer
N. Volbers wrote:
Hello everyone,
first of all, thanks for this wonderful and fast file manager!
I was looking at an alter
Hello everyone,
first of all, thanks for this wonderful and fast file manager!
I was looking at an alternative gtk filemanager, pcmanfm, and noticed on
their screenshot page (on the very bottom) a nice-looking superuser
mode, see http://pcmanfm.sourceforge.net/screenshots.html .
Such a mode wo
np :)
but your thanks should go to Mr. Meurer for making a good intuitive
command interface :)
I've been checking that other program, pcmanfm (kinda stupid name, but
that's the author's right), and I really do like what he's done with
the tabs and superuser mode, it'd be great if this gets in
Hi Kresimir,
Kresimir Spes schrieb:
> yeah, that would be a great feature!
>
> meanwhile, you can create a custom action with this command:
>
> gksu thunar %d
>
Works great. So basically my request is reduced to the request for a
warning that is displayed, if you run thunar as root user.
Ni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/24/2006 12:20 PM, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>
>> I guess part of it is that I don't quite "trust" D-Bus for some reason
>> (no logical reason). For example, I'd rather use
>> thunar_vfs_move_files() with the destination a
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>>If you use the D-Bus interface, you shouldn't use the trash:-module in
>>thunar-vfs at all.
Why not? Won't conforming implementations of the trash spec have to do
everything the same way anyway?
>>>
>>>Because that way xfdesktop and Thunar are polli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/24/2006 10:43 AM, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
If you use the D-Bus interface, you shouldn't use the trash:-module in
thunar-vfs at all.
>> Why not? Won't conforming implementations of the trash spec have to do
>>
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>>>If you use the D-Bus interface, you shouldn't use the trash:-module in
>>>thunar-vfs at all.
>
> Why not? Won't conforming implementations of the trash spec have to do
> everything the same way anyway?
Because that way xfdesktop and Thunar are polling the trash, whic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> If you use the D-Bus interface, you shouldn't use the trash:-module in
> thunar-vfs at all.
Why not? Won't conforming implementations of the trash spec have to do
everything the same way anyway?
-brian
-BEGIN PG
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
I'm finding some weirdness with retrieving the icon to be displayed for
the trash. When the trash status changes between empty and full,
xfdesktop notices, and invalidates its old icon pixbuf. But when it
calls thunar_vfs_info_get_custom_icon() again, it'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>> Hey Benny,
>>
>> I'm finding some weirdness with retrieving the icon to be displayed for
>> the trash. When the trash status changes between empty and full,
>> xfdesktop notices, and invalidates it
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
> Hey Benny,
>
> I'm finding some weirdness with retrieving the icon to be displayed for
> the trash. When the trash status changes between empty and full,
> xfdesktop notices, and invalidates its old icon pixbuf. But when it
> calls thunar_vfs_info_get_custom_icon() ag
12 matches
Mail list logo
