Re: [Thunar-dev] Unable to use fuse-mounted file systems

2006-06-06 Thread Tim Tassonis
Benedikt Meurer wrote: Tim Tassonis wrote: Can you try to compile w/o FAM/Gamin? I now installed xfce beta from debian unstable and there it works fine. I know have two scripts, isomount and arcmount, defined as applications for ISO Images and zip files respectively, that will mount

Re: [Thunar-dev] Unable to use fuse-mounted file systems

2006-06-06 Thread Tim Tassonis
fuseiso $FILENAME $MOUNTPOINT thunar $MOUNTPOINT fusermount -u $MOUNTPOINT This will work as long as this is the first instance of thunar, or thunar is build w/o D-BUS support. Otherwise the thunar command will just send a message to the running instance and terminate right away. thunar

Re: [Thunar-dev] Unable to use fuse-mounted file systems

2006-06-06 Thread Tim Tassonis
Hi Benedikt Benedikt Meurer wrote: Tim Tassonis wrote: What do you think, do you see this being implemented in thunar, therefore expanded to: thunar --standalone \ --sidepane=none \ --location-selector=toolbar \ --view=details \ --no-home-escape , which

Re: [Thunar-dev] Unable to use fuse-mounted file systems

2006-06-04 Thread Tim Tassonis
An isomount reports: df /home/tit/mnt/fuseiso/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on fuseiso 0 0 0 - \ /home/tit/mnt/fuseiso/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso Could this be worked around in

[Thunar-dev] Unable to use fuse-mounted file systems

2006-05-31 Thread Tim Tassonis
First of all, thunar is coming along really great and is now my preferred file manager. Thanks a lot. I problem I am hitting now is with fuse filesystems. I tried isomount and archivemount and on both, thunar refuses to go into a directory where such a filesystem is mounted. Possible reasons:

Re: [Thunar-dev] Thunar Extension Framework

2005-09-14 Thread Tim Tassonis
Benedikt Meurer wrote: Biju Chacko wrote: I always thought xfce is supposed to be an alternative for people that like to do without all that additional, costly stuff. A separate vfs layer certainly would go into that direction. Well, in xfce we've never followed the approach of avoid

Re: [Thunar-dev] Thunar Extension Framework

2005-09-14 Thread Tim Tassonis
Benedikt Meurer wrote: Tim Tassonis wrote: I think the argument of supporting additional information like metadata, mime/type etc is fundamentally wrong, exactly because the Linux/UNIX/Posix VFS layer does not support it. So you have to implement the File/metadata mapping yourself anyway