Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
So, to sum up, we don't touch it and leave it as KB/MB/GB?
I'd say kB/MB/GB, but it's of course up to you.
Oki doki, then it's kb now.
-b
Benedikt
___
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@xfce.org
Laurent Meunier wrote:
4/ About the location bar and navigation buttons, this location selector
is very useful... until you don't need the next/previous arrow buttons.
My idea is to use the same size for all buttons and to fill the location
bar with them (only if necessary). It's hard to
Benedikt Meurer schrieb:
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
So, to sum up, we don't touch it and leave it as KB/MB/GB?
I'd say kB/MB/GB, but it's of course up to you.
Oki doki, then it's kb now.
Referring to the commit, you've changed it to kB, hehe.
- Jannis
Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
So, to sum up, we don't touch it and leave it as KB/MB/GB?
I'd say kB/MB/GB, but it's of course up to you.
Oki doki, then it's kb now.
Referring to the commit, you've changed it to kB, hehe.
Err, yes, kB. Dude, that were 10 mails just because of KB vs. kB.
Never
Benedikt Meurer wrote:
Laurent Meunier wrote:
4/ About the location bar and navigation buttons, this location selector
is very useful... until you don't need the next/previous arrow buttons.
My idea is to use the same size for all buttons and to fill the location
bar with them (only if
Erik Harrison wrote:
The only problem I have with find as you type as supported in detail
view is that there isn't a way to show the next match.
Control+G like in Firefox.
Erik
Benedikt
___
Thunar-dev mailing list
Thunar-dev@xfce.org
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
'K' sounds the least confusing of all of these ;^)
Not from my perspective.
If we wanted to be *really* pedantic, we'd recognise that k-, M-, and G-
are meaningless in this sense since they deal with powers of 10, and
instead use KiB, MiB, and GiB. However, I
Benedikt Meurer wrote:
So, to sum up, we don't touch it and leave it as KB/MB/GB?
This would be best.
PS: KiB/MiB/GiB would be ok too, if that helps to solve the problem.
This would be confusing and overly pedantic, IMO.
-- b
___
Thunar-dev mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benedikt Meurer wrote:
So, to sum up, we don't touch it and leave it as KB/MB/GB?
I'd say kB/MB/GB, but it's of course up to you.
-b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:34:43 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/30/2006 3:22 PM, sofar wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:14:37 +0200, Mikko Linnalo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One tiny issue that I noticed: filesize shown in
Hello,
I use Thunar for one month now, and I write to this list to share some
ideas to improve this wonderful file manager.
1/ Now that Thunar support zoom level to display icons. Could it be
possible to change zoom level with the mouse, something like ctrl +
wheelup (zoom in) or wheeldown
On ma, 2006-01-30 at 22:55 +0100, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
Laurent Meunier wrote:
1/ Now that Thunar support zoom level to display icons. Could it be
possible to change zoom level with the mouse, something like ctrl +
wheelup (zoom in) or wheeldown (zoom out) ?
Doable, but don't think
Mikko Linnalo wrote:
1/ Now that Thunar support zoom level to display icons. Could it be
possible to change zoom level with the mouse, something like ctrl +
wheelup (zoom in) or wheeldown (zoom out) ?
Doable, but don't think that's really required. How often does one
change the zoom level?
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:14:37 +0200, Mikko Linnalo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One tiny issue that I noticed: filesize shown in status pane is using
K instead of k when size is shown in kilobytes. Megs (M) and gigs
(G) are shown with correct capitalisation.
I'm not entirely sure what reasoning
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:14:37 +0200, Mikko
Linnalo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: One tiny issue that I
noticed: filesize shown in status pane is using "K" instead
of "k" when size is shown in kilobytes. Megs (M) and gigs
(G) are shown with correct capitalisation. I'm not
entirely sure what
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:55:14 +0100, Benedikt Meurer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
3/ What do you think of implementing something like 'find as you type'
like in Firefox ? This could be very useful to quickly find a file or a
folder.
The detailed list view already support this.
16 matches
Mail list logo
