Richard
nevertheless. great effort and I think the important thing here is
the technique used to get the information into a TW.
Eric, did you use a similar method?
Alex
On 26 March 2015 at 02:20, RichardWilliamSmith <
richardwilliamsm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Apologies, Eric - the oversi
Apologies, Eric - the oversight was mine :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send em
On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 5:54:36 PM UTC-7, Richard Smith wrote:
>
> I'm sure we can all agree that the real tragedy of Macbeth is that it's
> never before been published in wikitext.
>
see http://tiddlytools.com/quickstart/tiddlybard.html#Macbeth
TiddlyBard.html, which is based on TWClass
I'm sure we can all agree that the real tragedy of Macbeth is that it's
never before been published in wikitext.
This oversight is now remedied :) - http://macbeth.didaxy.net/
I have been playing with "re-building" texts from their constituent
micro-content and it occurred to me that plays ar
Hi Danielo
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Danielo Rodríguez
wrote:
> Hello everyone.
>
> Did you discussed about this topic already on the hangout ? What were the
> concussions ?
>
There hasn't been a hangout since my last post. There isn't actually one
booked at the moment, but hopefully it
Hi Roma
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Roma wrote:
> I'd like to get the sparklines code (for TWC) as a plugin, but the links
> seem no more effective. Could one provides a new one ?
> Thanks in advance...
>
The sparkline code was never removed from TWC, and can be seen here:
https://github
Hello everyone.
Did you discussed about this topic already on the hangout ? What were the
concussions ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywik
> I see- I didn't realize tiddlyspot.com existed in addition to
> tiddlyspace.com. I had been exploring some the tiddlyspace.com
> subdomains. It seems the tiddlyspace.com TWs are more modern than the
> ones hosted at tiddlyspot.com from what I've seen (of course many are
> private within the
Hi Jeremy,
I just started using TW so I didn't even think of that but now that you
mention it, it seems obvious to look for them there. The new tiddlers are
in fact there and I can open them. For some reason I made the assumption
they would be automatically displayed in the default initial vi
Hi Jim
Those server messages indicate that the changes are being saved to the
server without problems. Do you see your newly created tiddlers under the
"Recent" tab?
Best wishes
Jeremy
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Jim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to run TW5 on node. My first attempts inv
Hi,
I'm trying to run TW5 on node. My first attempts involved following the
instructions on the TW site for running TW under node.js exactly. Things
appear to be working correctly on the server side. I get messages
indicating that new tiddlers have been created and they physically exist on
> I assume you mean a blog post using some TW, right? - but I recall hearing
> something about google having a hard time indexing or was it even reading
> TW's due to their fragmented nature... or maybe that was only concerning
> tiddlyspace, which has a radically different architecture.
>
>
> No meta tags necessary, just something like writing a short blog post
> about TW (or whatever) with links containing the keyword
>
I assume you mean a blog post using some TW, right? - but I recall hearing
something about google having a hard time indexing or was it even reading
TW's due
I'd like to get the sparklines code (for TWC) as a plugin, but the links
seem no more effective. Could one provides a new one ?
Thanks in advance...
Le samedi 10 février 2007 03:09:47 UTC+1, Morris Gray a écrit :
>
> The sparkline seems 'so yesterday' sometimes. Probably a lot of new
> users don
> I thought I would not take a performance hit because I was running on
node.js and thought I would be covered by lazy loading. It was only after
loading several hundred bits of data that I realized how much this slows
down the performance of the wiki. I have gone through the threads here on
goog
Thanks all for the warm welcome.
> Regarding the keywords; How is a regular user to put in those keywords? As
> metatags in html-head? ...
No meta tags necessary, just something like writing a short blog post about
TW (or whatever) with links containing the keyword wanting to rank for,
poin
Edward Del Grosso wrote:
>
> [...] thought I would not take a performance hit *because I was running
> on node.js and thought I would be covered by lazy loading. *
>
Hm, that's an argument I would have fallen for. What *is* actually the case?
<:-)
--
You received this message because you are
17 matches
Mail list logo
