[tw] Re: Mermaid plugin?

2014-12-10 Thread Rolograaf
I think 96k without? Op woensdag 10 december 2014 20:23:02 UTC+1 schreef Rolograaf: > > Tobias, is that including d3? (that is already a TW plugin...) > > Op dinsdag 9 december 2014 11:18:15 UTC+1 schreef Tobias Beer: >> >> Wow, 500k for the minified version,

[tw] Re: Mermaid plugin?

2014-12-10 Thread Rolograaf
Tobias, is that including d3? (that is already a TW plugin...) Op dinsdag 9 december 2014 11:18:15 UTC+1 schreef Tobias Beer: > > Wow, 500k for the minified version, that's perhaps a big uff. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To

Re: [tw] Mermaid plugin?

2014-12-07 Thread Rolograaf
Thanks Jeremy, Only i have never come across UML sequence diagams professionally... The handscripted layout is a nice touch! Cheers Rolograaf -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[tw] Mermaid plugin?

2014-12-07 Thread Rolograaf
from this article: Mermaid: Like Markdown for Diagrams http://dailyjs.com/2014/11/28/mermaid/ anybody know if there is a plugin already? looks like a useful addition... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyW

[tw] Re: Can't open tiddlywiki file in Firefox

2009-10-01 Thread Rolograaf
Same problem here, was gone when I unistalled the Skype plugin from Firefox. On 28 sep, 21:00, dewongway wrote: > Hi there,  I'm curious if anyone has problem opening their tiddlywiki > file with firefox 3.5.x.   I have been using tiddlywiki for over two > years now and until a month ago, I star