would be harmful.
/hpon
On 29 Jan, 20:07, PMario wrote:
> Hi hpon,
>
> I personally think, that the core (empty TiddlyWiki) is allready big
> enough. Some say, it is too big and stick with a version prior to
> jQuery. And as you say. There are some possibilities (plugins) out
>
are your thoughts on the matter?
Best Regards,
hpon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@goog
mbody an
entire wiki within one file. However, I find that sub-structuring
becomes the most preferable approach even when the complexity of the
TW is quite low.
Best Regards,
hpon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To pos
3 matches
Mail list logo
