[tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-12 Thread PMario
On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 12:13:43 PM UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > The following was intended to be a presentation at the 2017 European > TiddlyWiki Meetup in Oxford > . It > turned out to be a most wonderful event but we had too mu

[tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-13 Thread Mat
PMario wrote: > > It doesn't load for me? > Is this still the case? Not that I changed anything, but I find my sites suffer from slow loading and suspect I've messed up something in the TW5 that I use as a template for my wikis. Apropo this, does anybody know how to analyze what causes slow loa

Re: [tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-12 Thread Alex Hough
Mat! The mode where you can pop out the sidebar into a new window works really well with my Pyramid TW (see Two Screens, Duet: sharing Ah-Ah!) Alex On 12 June 2017 at 15:24, PMario wrote: > On Monday, June 12, 2017 at 12:13:43 PM UTC+2, Mat wrote: >> >> The following was intended to be a pre

Re: [tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-13 Thread Mat
AlexHough wrote: > > The mode where you can pop out the sidebar into a new window works really > well with my Pyramid TW (see Two Screens, Duet: sharing Ah-Ah!) > Actually, it is the tiddler "Notes" that pops up. The sidebar is hidden or pushed off screen if I recall. <:-) -- You received thi

Re: [tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-13 Thread Thomas Elmiger
This is great, Mat! I would love to hear your explanations. I will have to play with your circle demo asap. Thanks for sharing anyway! Stylish regards, Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group an

Re: [tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-13 Thread Mat
Thomas I will have to play with your circle demo asap. > For unknown reasons that particular circle demo doesn't work in FF and there's some tweakign needed when it exceeds 50%. The source is found here (along with several other cool things on that site!!!) http://www.cssscript.com/demo/circu

Re: [tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-13 Thread Thomas Elmiger
Thanks, Mat, For unknown reasons that particular circle demo doesn't work in FF > Well, I found https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1308785 > and there's some tweakign needed when it exceeds 50%. > I think I can fix that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-13 Thread Thomas Elmiger
Here’s a solution that works in Firefox too: https://tid.li/tw5/styles.html#56%20Statistics%20Percent:%5B%5B56%20Statistics%20Percent%5D%5D%20CircleBar%2FStylesheet One more time $wikify is our friend. Happy hacking, Thomas -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-13 Thread Thomas Elmiger
Hmm, I just realize, that my solution works from 10 to 99 % only and does not take into account one and three digit percentages. I’ll sleep over that. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiv

Re: [tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-13 Thread Thomas Elmiger
o.k. The demo is fixed. Next on my list: set the >50% flag automagically. Am Dienstag, 13. Juni 2017 23:36:03 UTC+2 schrieb Thomas Elmiger: > > Hmm, I just realize, that my solution works from 10 to 99 % only and does > not take into account one and three digit percentages. > I’ll sleep over th

Re: [tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-14 Thread Thomas Elmiger
There is a new demo available for the circle graphs: https://tid.li/tw5/styles.html#57%20Statistics%20Percent:%5B%5B57%20Statistics%20Percent%5D%5D%20%5B%5B58%20Statistics%20Percent%20Red%5D%5D%20%24%3A%2F_telmiger%2FCircleGraph%20%24%3A%2F_telmiger%2FCircleGraph%2FStylesheet Next on my list: set

Re: [tw] Re: [presentation] CSS in TW

2017-06-15 Thread @TiddlyTweeter
Ciao Thomas & Mat Great stuff. Just a side note on such Circles from an informational design viewpoint. They are extremely good for depicting a limited amount of data. I think its right they are best seen individually as a record of percentage, at which they are epic. Its a simple idea that re