On Feb 26, 7:50 am, Helge h3l93.ph1l...@gmail.com wrote:
Seconded. I like MD, especially MultiMarkDown, which adds support for
tables and footnotes.
Just for reference, and not entirely germane but maybe interesting,
TiddlySpace just got support for footnotes in the markdown that it
supports:
If you don't mind I'll come back at you on this. In reality you have geeks
and you have dumb users and not much in between. You and I know how to view
localStorage and dump it out to a json file. Granted our dumb - ahem
critical mass - users don't, but neither do they really know how to
For 1. I'd love to see localstorage being used, with an option to 'export'
or 'pack' the file for moving the file around. 'export' would add all the
tiddlers to the html file and start a download. 'packing' would be
importing from the file to localstorage and removing from the html file.
On
On 20 February 2013 18:55, Jeremy Ruston jeremy.rus...@gmail.com wrote:
For 1. I'd love to see localstorage being used, with an option to 'export'
or 'pack' the file for moving the file around. 'export' would add all the
tiddlers to the html file and start a download. 'packing' would be
they have their
file and can put it on a stick and send it to folks which they can't do
with localStorage but, IMHO this is an edge case. I use TW for me and me
alone. TW is awesome but not for sharing or collaboration.
While TiddlyWiki collaboration (multiple authors) is problematic,
sharing
Points taken, I guess a lot of it comes down to how TW is being used. I
would maintain that when a TW is passed on it is either intended as a fork
(clone) or a read only source. Collaboration is basically out.
A situation in which a users works with localStorage 99% of the time and
then exports
6 matches
Mail list logo
