Hi Lucian
> One thing that puzzles me in this case is that a) the docs explicitly
state that multiple @@ lines in a row are ok and b) the following works
fine:
The confusion here is that there are two forms of the @@ syntax, one for
"inline" mode (within a paragraph or other block of text) and on
On Thursday, 7 May 2015 10:45:42 UTC+1, PMario wrote:
>
> Imo it would be easier to create and read, if you use
>
> some text
>
> It is much clearer, easier to type and valid html code.
>
Agreed. This is exactly the conclusion that I came to myself, and what I've
ended up doing. Looking back, I'
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 11:51:19 PM UTC+2, Lucian H wrote:
>
> If you create a tiddler with the following content:
>
>
> @@.class1
> @@.class2
> Some text
> @@
>
>
Imo it would be easier to create and read, if you use
some text
It is much clearer, easier to type and valid html code.
-m
On Wednesday, 6 May 2015 23:28:32 UTC+1, Eric Shulman wrote:
>
>
> The reason the problem doesn't appear if the divs are moved inside the
> class wrapper is that ... effectively isolates the outer @@..@@
> from the inner one, like this:
>
> @@.class1 @@.class2 content here
>
>
Hmm. Ok. One th
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 2:51:19 PM UTC-7, Lucian H wrote:
>
>
> @@.class1
> @@.class2
> Some text
> @@
>
>
> Tiddlywiki breaks badly - you end up with the following html:
>
>
> .class2
> Some text
>
>
>
> If you move the divs inside the class assignments it works ok. This is
> espe
5 matches
Mail list logo