Re: [tw] Re: Odd bug with divs and styles

2015-05-07 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi Lucian > One thing that puzzles me in this case is that a) the docs explicitly state that multiple @@ lines in a row are ok and b) the following works fine: The confusion here is that there are two forms of the @@ syntax, one for "inline" mode (within a paragraph or other block of text) and on

[tw] Re: Odd bug with divs and styles

2015-05-07 Thread Lucian H
On Thursday, 7 May 2015 10:45:42 UTC+1, PMario wrote: > > Imo it would be easier to create and read, if you use > > some text > > It is much clearer, easier to type and valid html code. > Agreed. This is exactly the conclusion that I came to myself, and what I've ended up doing. Looking back, I'

[tw] Re: Odd bug with divs and styles

2015-05-07 Thread PMario
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 11:51:19 PM UTC+2, Lucian H wrote: > > If you create a tiddler with the following content: > > > @@.class1 > @@.class2 > Some text > @@ > > Imo it would be easier to create and read, if you use some text It is much clearer, easier to type and valid html code. -m

[tw] Re: Odd bug with divs and styles

2015-05-06 Thread Lucian H
On Wednesday, 6 May 2015 23:28:32 UTC+1, Eric Shulman wrote: > > > The reason the problem doesn't appear if the divs are moved inside the > class wrapper is that ... effectively isolates the outer @@..@@ > from the inner one, like this: > > @@.class1 @@.class2 content here > > Hmm. Ok. One th

[tw] Re: Odd bug with divs and styles

2015-05-06 Thread Eric Shulman
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 2:51:19 PM UTC-7, Lucian H wrote: > > > @@.class1 > @@.class2 > Some text > @@ > > > Tiddlywiki breaks badly - you end up with the following html: > > > .class2 > Some text > >