[tw] Re: Some further TW5 thoughts/opinions

2014-04-30 Thread Alberto Molina
Hi Jeremy, Concerning the "multiple tag fields" proposed by Mat and seconded by David Gifford, you wrote a while back: > The change would manifest itself in several ways: > > * When adding a new field to the tiddler, one would be able to stipulate > the type of the field. The list of types wo

Re: [tw] Re: Some further TW5 thoughts/opinions

2013-07-23 Thread Jeremy Ruston
Hi Mat As usual, interesting feedback, thank you. I'm hoping that the rich link tooltips will also give access to a preview of the target tiddler which should answer some of your concerns. Another possibility might be to automatically render links to tiddlers that don't have body text as tab pill

[tw] Re: Some further TW5 thoughts/opinions

2013-07-23 Thread Mat
Another wanted feature (also for TW classic): To somehow see if a tiddler contains text or not without having to open it. The need arises from the fact that tiddler names are both tiddlers and tags and often serve as mere headings/holders (eg in TreeView menu) which forces you to open it to che

Re: [tw] Re: Some further TW5 thoughts/opinions

2013-05-13 Thread Jeremy Ruston
> > Is there a built-in provision of easy storing and retrieval of field > values in tiddlers? This would be immensely helpful for using TW5 as > database. Do you mean from an API point of view? There is a UI for viewing tiddler fields at the moment, and editing will be added. The API for access

[tw] Re: Some further TW5 thoughts/opinions

2013-05-13 Thread passingby
Is there a built-in provision of easy storing and retrieval of field values in tiddlers? This would be immensely helpful for using TW5 as database. On Monday, May 13, 2013 8:27:15 AM UTC-4, PMario wrote: > > On Monday, May 13, 2013 11:27:35 AM UTC+2, Mat wrote: >> >> * tag systemConfig ought to

[tw] Re: Some further TW5 thoughts/opinions

2013-05-13 Thread PMario
On Monday, May 13, 2013 11:27:35 AM UTC+2, Mat wrote: > > * tag systemConfig ought to be renamed into something less scary and > informative, perhaps "plugin" or possibly "autostart". (I think we're a bit > home blind but consider how awkward it would be if, say, evernote or > facebook required