Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

Thanks for the report Vincent. It would be very useful to know what you discover. Perhaps you could take the shortest file and start adding its tiddlers to an empty TW until it fails to save, then we'll know what the problem is. I haven't been able to replicate this. On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 8:14

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

Paul, I think the problem is likely not in TiddlySaver.jar because it works with an empty tiddlywiki file. It works within the Dropbox folder so it has nothing to do with dropbox, either. After trying with more of my TW files I realized that it fails only with some of them and works with others

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

No worries Vincent. My guess is there's a problem with Dropbox compatibility given it's working everywhere else. If I get a chance sometime I'll try installing the drivers and see what happens. Cheers. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Vincent Yeh wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thanks a lot for the hel

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

Hi Paul, Thanks a lot for the help. I am busy preparing for a few events to come in the next few weeks. The nearest one is next weekend (a long weekend here), not sure if I can find time on this before tha but I will try and post the results here as soon as I get them Have fun! Vincent -- Yo

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

@Eric I created the pull request right after writing to Vincent but didn't notice you had written only minutes after I wrote to him. It took a while as my first attempt was accidently created off the wrong branch but it should be correct now (no TiddlySaver changes included). Let me know if anythi

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

Hi Eric. I already created a pull request with the change -- just a misspelling of a function name that has hidden for a while. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Eric Shulman wrote: > On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 11:31:54 AM UTC-8, PVHL wrote: >> >> Since writing I discovered there is a spell

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 11:31:54 AM UTC-8, PVHL wrote: > > Since writing I discovered there is a spelling mistake in the TWC code so: > Last Exception: TypeError: Cannot call method 'call' of undefined > is actually because of the reporting bug and not related to your problem > (thankfully!

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

@Vincent Since writing I discovered there is a spelling mistake in the TWC code so: Last Exception: TypeError: Cannot call method 'call' of undefined is actually because of the reporting bug and not related to your problem (thankfully! And sorry; I've not looked at that area of the TW code befor

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

Thanks Vincent. The result from javaDebugInformation shows TS is loaded, though not that security settings are OK. Still, the signed jar shouldn't need extra permission and should warn if it does. 1) Did it used to work on these boxes? 2) Could you move a copy of the file and TS.jar to an ordina

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

Oh, forgot to mention that these was done on a Windows 8.1 machine with Chrome 33.0.1750.117 m using Java 1.7.0_51 (I am at work, the Ubuntu is home). Same thing happens as when I was using the Ubuntu box: I see the "Main file saved" message but it's not really saved. Have fun! Vincent On Mond

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

Dear Paul, Thanks for the quick reply and the hint. Here is what I am using and have observed. 1) I am using TW 2.8.1 2) Yes, every time I pressed "save changes" I see the following message in console. 1. XMLHttpRequest cannot load file:///C%3A%5CUsers%5CUser%5CDropbox%5Cpublic_html%5Cw

Re: [tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

Hi Vincent. I can't currently replicate your setup, but am wondering: 1) Which version of TWC are you using? 2) Do you see any error message in the JavaScript console? 3) Can you call javaDebugInformation() from the console and post the result? 4) Can you open the Java console and post the log fr

[tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

Hi Paul, Thank you very much for the efforts. It is great that it works again. I tried it with Chrome 30.0.1599.101/Ubuntu 13.10 (kernel 3.11.0-17-generic), using Java 7.0_51, it does show the "Main TiddlyWiki file saved" message box when I clicked the "save changes" command. However, when I re

[tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

@grant, @scott Thank you for the reports of successful use. Thank you also for your encouraging words. I'm very glad to have helped. Cheers, Paul. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

[tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

I've been waiting for this for months ever since the java update that froze my TWC. Have since been dabbling in TW5, but this is fantastic! Also using Chrome, Java 7.51 Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from

[tw] Re: TiddlySaver is now timestamped and signed

Hi Paul, Works fine, Java 7.51 installed and my old Tiddlywiki (don't know what version, but not too out of date) continues to save in Chrome. Thank you very much! Grant On Monday, February 10, 2014 4:31:45 AM UTC+1, PVHL wrote: > > I've posted a newly timestamped Tiddlysaver > jar