[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-13 Thread BJ
This is now fixed. There is a new ''tidsub" filter - example: [plugintidsub[TiddlerName]fields[]] all the best BJ On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 9:04:46 PM UTC+2, Rustem wrote: > > If I replace "fields[]" with "tags[]" in your example, I get the > override's tags. Is "fields[]" the only

[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-07 Thread wimm
did you have a look at? <$view tiddler="title" subtiddler="tiddlertitle" field="tags"/> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@goog

[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-06 Thread TonyM
My 2cents You want to override the override of a shadow tiddler to access its fields? What about cloning the shadow tiddler with a new name (remove and tags that make it active) and use that copy to identify the list of fields in it, which will match those in the original shadow tiddler. You ca

[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-06 Thread BJ
unfortunately it does not work! The filter is pulling the unshadow tiddler out or the store. On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 9:04:46 PM UTC+2, Rustem wrote: > > If I replace "fields[]" with "tags[]" in your example, I get the > override's tags. Is "fields[]" the only possible filter following

[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-05 Thread BJ
I've put it here: http://bjhacks.tiddlyspot.com/ enjoy! On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 2:51:33 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote: > > So, you have an operator "plugin", that replaces the overriding tiddler > with the original shadow tiddler, for the scope of the filter run??? This > belongs in the core

[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-04 Thread BJ
I dont think there is a way to do that. I have an extension that I use for this it has the syntax: <$set name="plugintiddler" value="$:/plugins/bj/struc"> <$list filter = "[plugintitle[$:/plugins/bj/struc/license]fields[]]"> <$view tiddler=<> subtiddler="$:/plugins/bj/struc/license" field=<> f

[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-03 Thread BJ
you can use the subtiddler option with the transclusion widget BJ On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 2:10:26 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote: > > Not see for myself, but *display*. > > I already got to the point where I can display each field of the original > by name, explicitly. What I'm looking for is

[tw] Re: working with "original" shadow tiddler

2017-09-01 Thread PMario
On Saturday, September 2, 2017 at 1:09:48 AM UTC+2, Rustem wrote: > > When I have a tiddler overriding a shadow, how can I display the original > shadow tiddler as defined in a plugin, including all it's fields? > Just rename the "new" tiddler and the shadow will come back. back and forth.