Re: [tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

Hi Mat > I think there's a misunderstanding (it could be on my part): IMO the "outer > layout" is very much defined, and static, here. If a user is to add a > "sidebar" then this would not be done on this outer level but within the > "right" area. > > Referencing the proposal for a new TW

Re: [tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

Ooohhh. That's nice. Even works on mobile! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on

Re: [tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

Jan wrote: > > https://szenio.de/Grid/ > I hope you like it. By mere coincidence did I note the on-hover red toolbar up in the right corner and that one is supposed to click the "G" there. After having done that: Yes! I do like it! ;-) <:-) -- You received this message because you are

Re: [tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

Hi Mat, Thanks for that Layout-Tip. I was searching for something like that for quite some time. I made a quick attempt to implement that Magazine-Style. https://szenio.de/Grid/ I hope you like it. Jan Am 07.04.2020 um 12:05 schrieb Mat: C'mon... it's just 20 lines! Shouldn't take more

Re: [tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

@Jeremy - thank you for a great and clear reply! I think there's a misunderstanding (it could be on my part): IMO the "outer layout" is very much defined, and static, here. If a user is to add a "sidebar" then this would not be done on this outer level but *within* the "right" area.

Re: [tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

Jeremy et al, Of course ultimately such a layout change needs to minimise complexity and maximise functionality. If I read Jeremy's flexbox proposal correctly there will be a base flexible and responsive layout on top of which we can add elements that look like the current layout or more,

Re: [tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

Hi Mat > The OP was not a "protest", I hope that's clear. Yes indeed! > Could you point to what is not possible in this w3school example > > or some other example? I'm thinking that by means of the usual list-by-tags

Re: [tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Over in that thread, I tried to explain why the grid layout isn’t suitable > for the main TiddlyWiki layout. > The OP was not a "protest", I hope that's clear. > The grid layout requires that all of the elements making up the layout be > known in advance, so that one

Re: [tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

Hi Mat, Tony, > On 7 Apr 2020, at 23:18, Mat wrote: > > > Well, I didn't really and that's why I threw it out in this silly way. I > expect it would take a *lot* of testing and tweaking. Sure, a "magazine > layout" would be cool...but I have no idea when to use it and I suspect very > few

[tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

Mat Thanks for sharing this reference. How do you imagin implementing this? I ask because I am interested in both making more interesting tiddlywiki layouts and a recent github issue on page layout. There are great resources out there with css and html which I would like to document a work

[tw5] [semi-off-topic] Magazine layout

C'mon... it's just 20 lines! Shouldn't take more than a few minutes, right! https://css-tricks.com/responsive-grid-magazine-layout-in-just-20-lines-of-css/ <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and