On Jun 14, 5:23 am, "cd...@peermore.com" wrote:
> On Jun 13, 9:23 pm, Oveek wrote:
> Seems to be just sqlite.
> Thanks, let me know if the newest stuff does the right thing (even if
> differently).
Thanks for the concerted efforts; it sounds like you're taming a multi-
armed kraken!
I have g
On Jun 13, 9:23 pm, Oveek wrote:
> Disregard what I said about the strange behavior. This commit looks to
> be working perfectly, and in only 4 lines! I was originally confused
> because I was still seeing multiple instances of the StoreSet being
> initialized, but I was overlooking that one will
On Jun 13, 8:38 pm, Oveek wrote:
> Okay I've been doing some testing. I think your latest commit in the
> StoreSet has hit the problem at its source, but I'm seeing some things
> that still aren't making sense.
Unfortunately my change screws things up for sqlite, while working for
other DBs. So
