Interesting thread. Very welcome indeed :).
There is one thing that draws my attention.
FND wrote:
> Beyond this basic entity, TiddlyWeb adds a layer for grouping (bags) and
> combining (recipes) tiddler collections. These concepts already map to the
> existing TiddlyWiki's understanding of wo
Hi FND, I will copy your post to the "tiddlywiki5 and html" thread on
the usergroup. That discussion is more directly about html versus
wikitext.
Please everyone if you reply on the html versus wikitext topic, go
there. This thread is for the concept of multi-record tiddlers.
--
You received thi
with added data automation abilities. The
data automation would be a layer "above" the page-editing, not
replacing it. It would be the symbiosis between wiki-text editing and
automated applications.
Let me know what you think.
~Xen
[1]
http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki/browse_t
tibility, and the
> opportunities offered by breaking it.
Rewriting plugins is also a sacrifice I would make. Some of it will be
easier because many existing plugins would start using jQuery
properly. (Another language to learn :P).
I'm looking forward to your new architecture, but I'
You can look at wikispaces here:
http://tidmanual.wikispaces.com/
You can anonymously edit the page to check out the editors.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki...@googlegroups.com.
ain. Not that it
matters, just giving it as input.
~Xen
On 29 mrt, 23:32, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
> In TiddlyWiki5, tiddlers are typically stored HTML so I think that it
> would make sense to handle your scenario by structuring your records
> as unobtrusively marked up HTML, and then usi
Hey guys,
I would like to ask a question about something. It's not something I
am already considering to implement or build, but it'd like to know
what is possible; what the context is.
I have this idea about multi-record tiddlers. I know the slicing
mechanism treats the tiddler as a record so th
