Mat wrote:
>
>
>- Filtered transclusion: Replace the syntax {{{[...]}}} with
>[evaluate[...]] i.e an "evaluate" operator. In case of space
>separation, use single or triple quotes. This would visually harmonize
>filtered transclusion with how filters look overall. It would also m
>
>
>- Let the widget name serve as the "main attribute":
>
> Ah, I now note that I already posted very similar thoughts to this bullet.
<:-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receivin
Further sugar for TWX and mind:
- Let the widget name serve as the "main attribute":
<$set name=x value=...> → <$set=x value=...>
<$tiddler tiddler=x ...> → <$tiddler=x ...>
<$list filter=...>→ <$list=...>
(Not everything has a "main attribute")
- Filtered transclusion: R
Further on syntax for TWX:
- The syntactic distinction between <$thisWidget/> and <>
is unjustified and confusing for an end user. "So what" if they are
different constructs programmatically - as an end user I just "type them"
in my text and they do things. The one critical syntacti
That syntax would be much much harder for me to use. I am dyslexic and have
to rely mostly on the shapes of things, not on individual letters. Doing
this would make reading and writing the code take many times longer for me.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Both due to the many variants employed and a lack for more easily typed
brackets or other enclosing characters in TW, i.e:
[[...]] <<...>> {{...}} '...' "..." """...""" {{{...}}}
and in filter variants [...] <...> {...}
there could instead be a single type but with a "flag" to signify what is
i
>
>
>- Change name of "currentTiddler" variable to be only "current". One
>reason is because it is not always tiddlers we're talking about. Possibly
>currentTitle, which as least is closer to what the outputs {{{ from this
>filter }}} are. (Also, minor, but the "is operator" use
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:25:52 PM UTC+3:30, Mat wrote:
>
> For "TWX", i.e a *totally hypothetical* future version of TW:
>
>
>- Replace $set with an empowered $vars for direct parameter value
>setting.
>- ...and merge $wikify into it. Wikification can be toggled via a
>
