On Jun 23, 8:16 am, Oveek wrote:
> Minor hiccup with the addition of the validation code. After its
> introduction, the policies table (assuming sqlstore) is expected to
> have the new 'accept' column. But when using an older sqlstore
> instance without an 'accept' column, the latest tiddlyweb ma
My progress was recently stymied for a while by a server related
issue, but I've got that sorted now.
Minor hiccup with the addition of the validation code. After its
introduction, the policies table (assuming sqlstore) is expected to
have the new 'accept' column. But when using an older sqlstore
Makes sense. It's just a bit of a pity that we have to choose an
non-intuitive name to get the defaults the right way round.
Martin
2009/6/16 cd...@peermore.com :
>
> On Jun 16, 2:48 pm, Martin Budden wrote:
>> a (perhaps) stupid question
>
> I thought we all agreed a long time ago that there a
On Jun 16, 2:48 pm, Martin Budden wrote:
> a (perhaps) stupid question
I thought we all agreed a long time ago that there are no stupid
questions?
> Why do you call the policy constraint "accept"? You call the
> constraint "accept", and validate if it is not set.
>
> Why not call the policy con
Chris,
a (perhaps) stupid question
Why do you call the policy constraint "accept"? You call the
constraint "accept", and validate if it is not set.
Why not call the policy constraint "validate", and only validate when it is set?
I'm not arguing about which way the default is, just about how mu
On Jun 16, 12:16 am, mahemoff wrote:
> Thanks for the update Chris. The flexible validation model makes sense
> - in the medium-to-long term I would also like to see TiddlyWeb ship
> with a default validator that allows for general HTML content, that
> does the usual Javascript stripping, matchin
Thanks for the update Chris. The flexible validation model makes sense
- in the medium-to-long term I would also like to see TiddlyWeb ship
with a default validator that allows for general HTML content, that
does the usual Javascript stripping, matching HTML tags, and so on.
Perhaps one that is ea
