On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, PMario wrote:
Which IMO is ok for now, but if you want to have some automatic update
in the future and you want to reuse some of the TW refresh code, the
becomes important.
Ah, okay, I get it now. I couldn't tell what the problems were from your
earlier messages.
Yes, th
I know, it looks right, but technically it isn't. I copied the code
from your link [1] and removed the "pilcrow" stuff for better
readability.
some text
paragraph 1
monospaced text
pargraph 2
some more text
As you can see, paragrap
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, PMario wrote:
On Jun 27, 8:52 pm, chris.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you be more specific than "It doesn't"?
Try my testcase
It's hard to tell what your testcase is, because you're using
tiddlywiki markup "[[" to indicate what I assume is supposed to
indicate different tid
have a look at the DOM structure too
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
On Jun 27, 8:52 pm, chris.d...@gmail.com wrote:
> Can you be more specific than "It doesn't"?
Try my testcase
testcase:
[[tiddler 1]]
paragraph 1
{{{monospaced text}}}
pargraph 2
[[tiddler 2]]
some text
<>
some more text
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, PMario wrote:
Hi Chris,
Should your code handle tiddler transclusions too?
I'm not sure I understand you. This page:
http://cdent.tiddlyspace.com/HelloThere
uses transclusions:
http://cdent.tiddlyspace.com/HelloThere.txt
and the purple-ness works fine there.
Can y
Hi Chris,
Should your code handle tiddler transclusions too?
It doesn't.
testcase:
[[tiddler 1]]
paragraph 1
{{{monospaced text}}}
pargraph 2
[[tiddler 2]]
some text
<>
some more text
-m
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To p
On Jun 25, 11:33 am, chris.d...@gmail.com wrote:
> So there's no block to handle. So the first part of purpleater is to
> create blocks.
I've made some adjustments that improve the situation for me.
Basically what it does is look inside any current block resulting from
the first split to see if th
On Jun 24, 3:15 pm, chris.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw purpleater which looks quite promising :)
> My question: Has anyone come up with a good way to post-process this
> HTML so that it can be used as a reasonable DOM (such that paragraphs
> are paragraphs etc).
I did 3 attempts allready. (Your an