Feature Request Tracker item #3482254, was opened at 2012-01-31 08:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bphinz
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126849&aid=3482254&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full co
Feature Request Tracker item #3482254, was opened at 2012-01-31 08:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by afluegel
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126849&aid=3482254&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full
Feature Request Tracker item #3482254, was opened at 2012-01-31 08:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bphinz
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126849&aid=3482254&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full co
Feature Request Tracker item #3482254, was opened at 2012-01-31 08:47
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by bphinz
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126849&aid=3482254&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contain a full co
Feature Request Tracker item #3482254, was opened at 2012-01-31 08:47
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by afluegel
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1126849&aid=3482254&group_id=254363
Please note that this message will contai
On 1/31/12 2:57 AM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:55:11 -0600
> DRC wrote:
>
>> How does it not work so well? You can't just commit potentially
>> disruptive patches after the code has been stabilized without first
>> opening them up for discussion.
>>
>> I expect a more detailed
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:55:11 -0600
DRC wrote:
> How does it not work so well? You can't just commit potentially
> disruptive patches after the code has been stabilized without first
> opening them up for discussion.
>
> I expect a more detailed answer than your commit log below.
>
The tight e
