Re: [Tigervnc-devel] fontconfig linking issue

2012-03-21 Thread Arthur Huillet
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 10:34:03 -0500 DRC wrote: > > I think the link above explains that we're actually supposed to link against > > fontconfig explicitly, in all cases. As long as it doesn't break existing > > builds, I guess it's OK to include the patch? > > It *does* break existing builds, as

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] fontconfig linking issue

2012-03-21 Thread DRC
On 3/21/12 8:05 AM, Arthur Huillet wrote: > For what it's worth, I think the issue is > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange Yes, someone already posted that link. > I'm afraid I don't know how to do that. CMake is something I know enough to > know that I don't want to know a

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] fontconfig linking issue

2012-03-21 Thread Arthur Huillet
Hi, On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 12:18:22 -0600 DRC wrote: > Just FYI-- I looked at this briefly, and from what I can tell, what you > really want to be doing is linking against Xft, not against fontconfig. This doesn't seem to work. Linking against Xft yields the following: /usr/bin/ld: ../common/fltk