Re: [Tigervnc-devel] rh692048 patch

2012-09-06 Thread Adam Tkac
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 08:30:08AM -0500, DRC wrote: On 9/5/12 11:24 PM, Brian Hinz wrote: Is there any good reason why the rh692048 patch [1] that RedHat, Debain, etc. are applying hasn't been merged into the trunk? I see Martin's point regarding the order of the security types in this

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] rh692048 patch

2012-09-06 Thread DRC
On 9/6/12 9:11 AM, Adam Tkac wrote: In my opinion the best will be to automatically add VeNCrypt only when user explicitly selects some VeNCrypt subtype (TLS*/X509*). If no VeNCrypt subtype is selected, then default should be VncAuth, not VeNCrypt,VncAuth, which is default now. I concur.

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] rh692048 patch

2012-09-06 Thread Brian Hinz
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:34 AM, DRC dcomman...@users.sourceforge.netwrote: On 9/6/12 9:11 AM, Adam Tkac wrote: In my opinion the best will be to automatically add VeNCrypt only when user explicitly selects some VeNCrypt subtype (TLS*/X509*). If no VeNCrypt subtype is selected, then