On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:51:46PM +0100, Martin Koegler wrote:
> Two general comments:
Thanks for your comments, I've modified the patch and
commited it as r4198.
> * This patch will probably break the windows build, as it adds an
> msg!=NULL assert without setting the variable on Windows. The b
Two general comments:
* This patch will probably break the windows build, as it adds an
msg!=NULL assert without setting the variable on Windows. The best
solution would be to add the windows implementation too.
* CSecurityTLS is only available, if tigervnc is built with GNUTLS.
So it should brea
On 11/10/2010 10:24 PM, Martin Koegler wrote:
> The best thing would be to change the default value of cafile at the
> startup of the program to $HOME/ . The current implementation only
> allows fixed values as default. I hit a similar problem while there
> was only one security type parameter
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 01:24:35PM +0100, Guillaume Destuynder wrote:
> No difference for me, I did as recommended on the IRC channel. I can put
> it directly there, too. If there's already a patch for this however I
> don't mind if it's used instead, in fact, it would be great too.
My implementio
On 10/27/2010 11:15 PM, Martin Koegler wrote:
1)
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:36:46PM +0200, Guillaume Destuynder wrote:
> Basic question: Wouldn't a generic messagebox (like in
> http://e9925248.users.sourceforge.net/0005-client-side-TLS-tunnel.patch
> File common/rfb/UserMsgBox.h) be more usefu
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 02:36:46PM +0200, Guillaume Destuynder wrote:
> Index: unix/vncviewer/CConn.cxx
> ===
> --- unix/vncviewer/CConn.cxx (revision 4175)
> +++ unix/vncviewer/CConn.cxx (working copy)
> +// getCertificateReply() is
Hi,
The attached patches show a dialog to accept the X509 certificate if
it's not yet trusted.
For example, if you haven't specified a certificate and it's the first
time you connect to a X509 enabled TigerVNC server.
Consequently, this also work for self-signed certificates.
It adds 2 files from
