Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-commits] SF.net SVN: tigervnc:[4689] trunk/common/fltk

2011-10-04 Thread DRC
On 10/4/11 4:34 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: >> Frankly, the fact that the main project developers insist on the use of >> esoteric build environments is a problem. > > MinGW had 1,059,337 downloads the last 7 days. The method of cross > compiling Windows binaries on Linux, using MinGW, is used by pop

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-commits] SF.net SVN: tigervnc:[4689] trunk/common/fltk

2011-10-04 Thread Peter Åstrand
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, DRC wrote: Frankly, the fact that the main project developers insist on the use of esoteric build environments is a problem. MinGW had 1,059,337 downloads the last 7 days. The method of cross compiling Windows binaries on Linux, using MinGW, is used by popular projects su

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-commits] SF.net SVN: tigervnc:[4689] trunk/common/fltk

2011-10-04 Thread DRC
On 10/4/11 2:26 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: > Can you submit them to: > > http://www.fltk.org/site/str.php?U+P0+S-2+C0+I0+E0+Q Probably better for Pierre or someone else who's familiar with that community's submission procedures to submit them, particularly since the patches are only relevant in the

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] [Tigervnc-commits] SF.net SVN: tigervnc:[4689] trunk/common/fltk

2011-10-04 Thread Peter Åstrand
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Re-commit MSVC build fixes, which were forcibly removed by 4675. Please (a) bring these upstream so they don't get deleted again, Can you submit them to: http://www.fltk.org/site/str.php?U+P0+S-2+C0+I0+E0+Q ? and (b) always check