On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 16:29:07 -0600
DRC wrote:
> OK, but if that is the case, then it should still be a fatal error if a
> particular FLTK feature is enabled and the X libraries needed to support
> that feature are not present.
Probably, but it's not entirely clear when to test for it. In a
perfe
On 1/23/12 3:16 PM, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>> I disagree with this patch. As we discussed and agreed to in the bug
>> report, we cannot support arbitrary configurations in which a user tries
>> to set up their own version of FLTK with limited functionality. Either
>> it has the necessary functional
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:28:40 -0600
DRC wrote:
> I disagree with this patch. As we discussed and agreed to in the bug
> report, we cannot support arbitrary configurations in which a user tries
> to set up their own version of FLTK with limited functionality. Either
> it has the necessary functio
I disagree with this patch. As we discussed and agreed to in the bug
report, we cannot support arbitrary configurations in which a user tries
to set up their own version of FLTK with limited functionality. Either
it has the necessary functionality for TigerVNC or it doesn't.
If this patch is tru
