Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Changes to configure.ac

2010-11-04 Thread DRC
r4184 should fix this. Please let me know if it doesn't. On 10/29/10 1:52 PM, Robert Goley wrote: > The changes made to configure.ac after revision 4128 have broken the > checks for gnutls on Debian 5.0 (Lenny). Using the version from 4128 > works perfectly. Wanted to let everyone know of the r

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Changes to configure.ac

2010-11-03 Thread DRC
I'll look into it this week. On 10/29/10 6:12 PM, Robert Goley wrote: > I spoke too soon but it was related to your change. Apparently, on my > last test I did not use the -static flag. This time I did which tripped > the errors. The errors did not appear when I did a simple ./configure > beca

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Changes to configure.ac

2010-10-29 Thread Robert Goley
I spoke too soon but it was related to your change.  Apparently, on my last test I did not use the -static flag.  This time I did which tripped the errors.  The errors did not appear when I did a simple ./configure because it uses shared by default.  This is the co

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Changes to configure.ac

2010-10-29 Thread DRC
Please post log. I think I was the one who made that change. On Oct 29, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Robert Goley wrote: > The changes made to configure.ac after revision 4128 have broken the checks > for gnutls on Debian 5.0 (Lenny). Using the version from 4128 works > perfectly. Wanted to let everyon

[Tigervnc-devel] Changes to configure.ac

2010-10-29 Thread Robert Goley
The changes made to configure.ac after revision 4128 have broken the checks for gnutls on Debian 5.0 (Lenny).  Using the version from 4128 works perfectly.  Wanted to let everyone know of the regression.  I can provide a config.log if anyone wants to look at it.