Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Ready for 1.1 beta

2011-03-03 Thread Adam Tkac
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:17:32PM -0500, Antoine Martin wrote: On 02/21/2011 10:46 AM, DRC wrote: I've spun a new build from r4305: http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases It checks out on all known issues I had, so from my point of view, we're ready for beta. I

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Ready for 1.1 beta

2011-03-03 Thread DRC
On 3/3/11 9:08 AM, Antoine Martin wrote: Does 7.5 work now? Shall I be using that instead? (I wasn't because there were some strange build errors previously - maybe fixed now) 7.5 doesn't work on RHEL 4 or 5, but it may work on more recent systems with newer autotools.

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Ready for 1.1 beta

2011-02-22 Thread Antoine Martin
On 02/21/2011 10:46 AM, DRC wrote: I've spun a new build from r4305: http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases It checks out on all known issues I had, so from my point of view, we're ready for beta. I propose that this build and source tarball become the official release.

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Ready for 1.1 beta

2011-02-21 Thread Adam Tkac
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 09:46:27AM -0600, DRC wrote: I've spun a new build from r4305: http://www.virtualgl.org/DeveloperInfo/TigerVNCPreReleases It checks out on all known issues I had, so from my point of view, we're ready for beta. I propose that this build and source tarball become

Re: [Tigervnc-devel] Ready for 1.1 beta

2011-02-21 Thread DRC
On 2/21/11 10:30 AM, Adam Tkac wrote: May I have some questions about Windows installer? 1. Why there is no winvnc with TLS? Because the only way I knew how to build TLS support was using MinGW, and WinVNC can't be built with MinGW. When I build TLS support on Windows, I am using the