[rfbproto] [PATCH] Add Makefile

2009-06-01 Thread Pierre Ossman
Targets for generating a PDF and a HTML page. Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman --- Index: Makefile === --- Makefile(revision 0) +++ Makefile(revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +all: rfbproto.pdf rfbproto.html + +.SUFFIXES : .rst .pdf

Re: [rfbproto] [PATCH] Add Makefile

2009-06-01 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2009-06-01 12:55 skrev Pierre Ossman: > Targets for generating a PDF and a HTML page. > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Ossman > --- > > Index: Makefile > === > --- Makefile (revision 0) > +++ Makefile (revision 0) > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@

Re: [rfbproto] [PATCH] Add Makefile

2009-06-01 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:17:17 +0200 Peter Rosin wrote: > > Those are spelled rst2newlatex.py and rst2html.py on my system. > What are their canonical names? > Upstream uses the .py suffix. Annoying... I guess we need to do something clever here. Rgds -- Pierre OssmanOpenSource-ba

Re: [rfbproto] [PATCH] Add Makefile

2009-06-04 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:30:55 +0200 Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:17:17 +0200 > Peter Rosin wrote: > > > > > Those are spelled rst2newlatex.py and rst2html.py on my system. > > What are their canonical names? > > > > Upstream uses the .py suffix. Annoying... > > I guess we nee

Re: [rfbproto] [PATCH] Add Makefile

2009-06-11 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2009-06-04 11:23 skrev Pierre Ossman: > On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:30:55 +0200 > Pierre Ossman wrote: > >> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:17:17 +0200 >> Peter Rosin wrote: >> >>> Those are spelled rst2newlatex.py and rst2html.py on my system. >>> What are their canonical names? >>> >> Upstream uses the .

Re: [rfbproto] [PATCH] Add Makefile

2009-06-16 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:07:01 +0200 Peter Rosin wrote: > > Hi Pierre, > > Sorry for the delay, I was on vacation... > > That works for me (if you lose the trailing newline in rsttool :-) > Will do. ;) Rgds -- Pierre OssmanOpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer