In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rob Seaman writes:
>Any serious
>proposal should include a serious risk analysis. Since we're talking
>about changing an international standard that has held for 30+ years,
>the onus falls on the group proposing a change.
And I think you will find that it wa
Just checking in - glad to see the conversation continues. I think a
cafeteria reply might be warranted. Press delete now if you disagree.
Poul-Henning Kamp says:
My interpretation of this is that systems which assume that DUT <
1s fail
This is one example of a larger class of risks tha
From: Brian Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [time-nuts] TI Counter Noise Floor/Resolution
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:06:50 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brian,
Just back from a 4 day of music festival, so lagging behind somewhat.
> Why we are talking about resolution and noise floor, I
From: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Re: UTC
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 17:19:34 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Certainly. But what's your point? I don't see these utilities failing
> > if a second slips here or there. The one case where time is critical
"Jack Hudler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See one on eBay and was wondering about its function. Is this NTP server
> that synchronizes to CDMA cellular?
>
> It says; "Board only inside, no oscillator, unit is in working condition"
> What say ye? Will this make a good enough NTP time source even
See one on eBay and was wondering about its function. Is this NTP server
that synchronizes to CDMA cellular?
It says; "Board only inside, no oscillator, unit is in working condition"
What say ye? Will this make a good enough NTP time source even without the
oscillator? What, where and how much wo
