Re: [time-nuts] UTC ~ GMT

2005-08-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Seaman writes: Any serious proposal should include a serious risk analysis. Since we're talking about changing an international standard that has held for 30+ years, the onus falls on the group proposing a change. And I think you will find that it was

Re: [time-nuts] 50th Anniversary of the Atomic Clock

2005-08-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brooke Clarke writes: I've been reading some of these articles and notice that NBS started work with Cesium standards around 1948, yet it was the Essen standard at NPL in the UK that seems to be the important one. I take it that this means that Essen's standard

Re: [time-nuts] 50th Anniversary of the Atomic Clock

2005-08-01 Thread Tom Van Baak
Brooke, My understanding is that NBS's early cesium work got sidetracked due to the move from Maryland to Colorado about that time. That's partly why NPL gets the limelight. The other reason is that the NPL cesium standard operated as a continuous production-quality atomic *clock*; while other

[time-nuts] H-Maser FYI

2005-08-01 Thread Tom Clark
Several people on this forum have interest in H-Masers. Here is a paper from a recent VLBI workshop designed to teach the PDOs (that means Poor Dumb Operators -- telescope drives at the VLBI stations) a bit about what is in the Maser box and why is it necessary: