The second is defined in terms of the Cs133 resonance- hence there is
an integer number of Hz in the resonance frequency viz. 9192 631 770
Hz.
But what about the Rb resonance frequency? It is always quoted as
being an integer number of Hz as well- viz 6834 682 608 Hz. Is there
some aspect of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dave Brown writes:
Or is the Rb resonance frequency, which is generally quoted as above,
actually rounded to be an integer number of Hz for convenience?
Perhaps a set of environmental conditions need to be specified as
well?
Well, for it to have more significant
The second is defined in terms of the Cs133 resonance- hence there is
an integer number of Hz in the resonance frequency viz. 9192 631 770
Hz.
A definition doesn't imply it has to be an integer. An
inch, for example, is defined to be 25.4 mm.
The cesium 9192631770 value looks like an
From: Tom Van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Rb resonance
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:44:55 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The second is defined in terms of the Cs133 resonance- hence there is
an integer number of Hz in the resonance frequency viz. 9192 631 770
Hz.
Hi,
I have placed raw 200DPI 8bit GIFs of the HP103AR manual on my website.
There's no index file; the scans are at:
http://www.nixiebunny.com/hp103ar/hp103ar01.gif
through
http://www.nixiebunny.com/hp103ar/hp103ar39.gif
so you can wget them easily. The files average 2 megabytes each, so
Tom van Baak, responding to Dave Brown noted:
But what about the Rb resonance frequency? It is always quoted as
being an integer number of Hz as well- viz 6834 682 608 Hz. Is there
some aspect of the physics of these transition frequencies that means
the Rb resonance has to be an
