The elder Motorola Oncore VP - ver 10
Magnus Danielson wrote:
From: "Tom Van Baak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Resolution T
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:46:35 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tom,
has anybody of you personal experience with the Trimble Resolution
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
>: But Trimble still don't have a checksum, do they ?
>
>At least one of the binary formats do not.
I know that RS-232 works 23492 times out of 23493[1] but there are
applications and regulatory domains that require all transmissions
to be
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
: >In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: >"Ulrich Bangert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: >: the complete technical information about the Res
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
>In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>"Ulrich Bangert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>: the complete technical information about the Resolution T including a
>: complete handbook can be downloaded from the Trimble pages. Having used
>:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Ulrich Bangert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: the complete technical information about the Resolution T including a
: complete handbook can be downloaded from the Trimble pages. Having used
: the Motorola binary protocol myself, i would judge the Trimble
Hi Folks,
the complete technical information about the Resolution T including a
complete handbook can be downloaded from the Trimble pages. Having used
the Motorola binary protocol myself, i would judge the Trimble protocol
is more easy to implemement. However, it seems as if a lot of more
informa
From: "Tom Van Baak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Trimble Resolution T
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 07:46:35 -0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tom,
> > has anybody of you personal experience with the Trimble Resolution T
> > time receiver? May be this one will be the definite success
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tom Van Baak" writes:
>> has anybody of you personal experience with the Trimble Resolution T
>> time receiver? May be this one will be the definite successor to the
>> Motorola M12+ ?
>
>http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/res-t/
Have you worked with the serial proto
> has anybody of you personal experience with the Trimble Resolution T
> time receiver? May be this one will be the definite successor to the
> Motorola M12+ ?
http://www.leapsecond.com/pages/res-t/
/tvb
___
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
Hi Folks,
has anybody of you personal experience with the Trimble Resolution T
time receiver? May be this one will be the definite successor to the
Motorola M12+ ?
Ulrich Bangert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ortholzer Weg 1
27243 Gross Ippener
___
time-nuts ma
How do the two compare? Having already a Z3801A would it worthwhile
to try to get hold of a Z3816A ? In other words, how does the MTI
OCXO used in the Z3816A compare with the 10811-60158 of the Z3801A ?
Thanks
Alberto, I2PHD
___
time-nuts mailing li
11 matches
Mail list logo