); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Good day,
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 02-Aug-07 at 11:32 Jared Morrisen wrote:
>); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
>Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
>
>Hi,
>
>I am having a debate with our CIO. He wrote in
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
From: Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Basic Stratum 1 question
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:55:21 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Richard H McCorkle wrote:
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
>
> Jared,
> Symmetricom has a Stratum definition page at:
> http://www.ntp-systems.com/think_sync_view_article.asp?ID=42&Newsle
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
>
>
>> In the telecommunications world, stratum refers to the holdover
>> performance of an oscillator in the event of loss of synchronization.
>> Stratum 1, Stratum 2, Stratum 3, and Stratum 4 are the most typical. A
>> Stra
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
From: John Ackermann N8UR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Basic Stratum 1 question
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:56:51 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROT
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 02/08/2007 18:00:43 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Several of you have talked about using XY displays for this. I'm probably
just dense, but I don't know what this
is... Can you provid
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:23:51 -0500, "Jason Rabel"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I pray to god you don't work for a bank or a healthcare organization...
>
>Apparently he wasn't hired for his intelligence... ;)
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I am h
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
jan seems to be having a bit of trouble posting so I'll add his off list
reply to the list discussion. I too have one of these on it's way and look
forward to building it.
Eric
Hi, Eric.
I saw the discussions on the TimeN
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
> Stratum 1, in the ntp world, is a source that's connected to an
> official source of time (the so-called Stratum 0). The CMOS clock
> isn't connected to NIST, therefore it can't be considered Stratum 1 by
> any stretch of th
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
> In the telecommunications world, stratum refers to the holdover
> performance of an oscillator in the event of loss of synchronization.
> Stratum 1, Stratum 2, Stratum 3, and Stratum 4 are the most typical. A
> Stratum 1 cloc
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Jared,
Symmetricom has a Stratum definition page at:
http://www.ntp-systems.com/think_sync_view_article.asp?ID=42&NewsletterID=1&month=4&year=2005
This is what they have to say;
Dr. David Mills from the University of Delaware,
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Several of you have talked about using XY displays for this. I'm probably just
dense, but I don't know what this
is... Can you provide some model info that I might look up. I'd love to have
this clock displaying on somethi
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
I pray to god you don't work for a bank or a healthcare organization...
Apparently he wasn't hired for his intelligence... ;)
>Hi,
>
>I am having a debate with our CIO. He wrote in a memo about timing:
>
>*Local hardware is
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
From: "Jared Morrisen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [time-nuts] Basic Stratum 1 question
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:32:06 -0400
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having a
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Jared Morrisen wrote:
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having a debate with our CIO. He wrote in a memo about timing:
>
> *Local hardware is to be considered Stratum
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 02/08/2007 16:33:26 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am having a debate with our CIO. He wrote in a memo about timing:
*Local hardware is to be considered Stratum 1, since it get time from
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi,
I am having a debate with our CIO. He wrote in a memo about timing:
*Local hardware is to be considered Stratum 1, since it get time from its
own CMOS.*
I told him that absurd and that it can't be considered stratum 1.
H1�dn�*'u�ijw^v� j[ ��)���ln��q�>j�!�
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi Nigel & Eric,
I've just order one of Jan's clocks. He has just got PCB's back in
stock. I looked quite carefully and 1PPS is standard. The board has a
PCF8563 RTC chip with a 1PPS output that is used by the microprocessor.
T
19 matches
Mail list logo
