); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Tom Van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jerry
It is amusing/distressing to see that the myth that using an FLL to lock
an oscillator to the PPS output of a GPS receiver is a good approach
still persists.
The optimum
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi:
While surfing I came across this:
http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~stephan/Astronomy/7day.html
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.precisionclock.com
___
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi group,
I an still somewhat in the middle of this project but what's left is mostly
fine tuning and the cosmetics of getting it enclosed. I have been using a
Trimble Thunderbolt for over a year now and, for the most part,
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 9/2/2007 13:16:32 Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But for many frequency (e.g., transmitters) or time interval
applications (e.g., frequency counters with finite gate times),
I'd like
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Murra
y Greenman writes:
The limitation on most GPSDOs is as Bruce says, lack of DAC resolution.
But for the timeconstants we are dealing with here, the DAC is 1000
times too fast, so
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO Question
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:06:03 +
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
This brings up another question: how good are true
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Fellow techies,
This is a heads-up that I will be selling at the DeAnza (ASVARO)
electronics swap meet in Cupertino, CA (just a bit southwest of San Jose) this
coming Saturday, August 8th.
(possibly) Of
