); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Jack Hudler wrote:
>> Sure sign of dyslexia :-)
>
> I heard that!!! :)
>
>
Tom Hambly and Rick Clark tell me I have lysdexia every day.. ;-)
(sic)
--
AMSAT Director and VP Engineering. Member: ARRL, AMSAT-DL,
TAPR, Packrat
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
It does seem perfectly acceptable when working HF to
*say* "KCs" (I'll be listening around x MHz, plus or
minus 10 KCs). Writing it does sort of date a person
though, which simply shows a level of experience.
> Re: [time-nuts
> especially when the intended meaning is obvious... such as mHz in an
> RF group. One would have to be pretty dumb to think that might mean
> milliHertz.
Years ago, I was in the lab when X came in collecting people for lunch.
Y had just started debugging a new board. It was getting its clock
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
> Sure sign of dyslexia :-)
I heard that!!! :)
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and fo
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Magnus Danielson wrote:
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
>
> From: Chuck Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT: You know your getting old when...
> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
On 9/6/07, James Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And you know you are getting picky when you insist on writing 80 kHz instead
> of 80 KHz.
No, *picky* would be pointing out that the subject line should be
"You kn
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In a message dated 07/09/2007 00:06:23 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Sure sign of dyslexia :-)
Dnot yuo maen delsyxia?
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Sure sign of dyslexia :-)
Didier
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chuck Harris
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 5:35 PM
> To: Discussion of precise time and
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
From: Chuck Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] OT: You know your getting old when...
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 18:35:25 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Chuck,
> Geeze! What if you do both?
Then you know t
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Geeze! What if you do both?
-Chuck Harris
James Maynard wrote:
> ); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
>
> And you know you are getting picky when you insist on writing 80 kHz instead
> of 8
Bert
Bert wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I appreciate the time you put in providing feedback. Your points are well
> noted and some of them will be applied in any subsequent design.
>
> Regarding throwing away the sample while the OCXO is stabilizing, I don't
> agree with your statement. While it might n
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
LOL!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of James Maynard
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:20 PM
To: 'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'
Subject: Re: [
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
I will be continuing the two frequency FMT on 80 meters tonight. The current
span is about 100 Hz. When most of the Doppler is removed from the
equation, calibration becomes the overriding factor. Check out the details
on the W
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Tom Van Baak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: And a time nut if you wonder if that's 80 kHz or 80.000 kHz
Or if you invent some ascii way to put a little bar over the last
significant
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
And a time nut if you wonder if that's 80 kHz or 80.000 kHz.
/tvb
- Original Message -
From: "James Maynard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement'"
Sent: Thursday, September
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
And you know you are getting picky when you insist on writing 80 kHz instead
of 80 KHz.
Jim
-- Original Message --
Received: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 09:40:05 AM PDT
From: "Jack Hudler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Discussion of
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
When you find yourself writing 80 KC instead of 80 KHz.
Jack
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tim
); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RETRY
Hi Bruce,
I appreciate the time you put in providing feedback. Your points are well noted
and some of them will be applied in any subsequent design.
Regarding throwing away the sample while the OCXO is stabilizing, I don't ag
18 matches
Mail list logo
