Have you checked the many 10811 documents on my web site?
http://www.ko4bb.com/cgi-bin/manuals.pl
Searchg for 10811
Didier KO4BB
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roy Phillips
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 12:14 PM
> To: Discussion
In a message dated 11/05/2008 18:15:57 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just found a 10811-60111, and I am wondering if you or another member
have the complete schematic for the unit - mine has the PC board #
05328-20027, with "fine adjust" pot and C12 &C15 - or is this th
Roy,
check this:
http://www.hparchive.com/Manuals/HP-10811AB-Manual.pdf
Btw. you don't happen to have a spare green pilot lamp lens, do you?
That's what my 5065A is missing
Regards,
Adrian
Roy Phillips schrieb:
> Jim
> I have just found a 10811-60111, and I am wondering if you or another membe
Jim
I have just found a 10811-60111, and I am wondering if you or another member
have the complete schematic for the unit - mine has the PC board #
05328-20027, with "fine adjust" pot and C12 &C15 - or is this the normal
format. I have not yet power it up and have noted the advice about
adjustm
- Original Message -
From: "Palfreyman, Jim L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement"
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP/Agilent 5065A Rubidium Vapour frequency standard
problem - fixed
> Thanks folks for all your ef
I can see we now agree this was a silly discussion :-)
Didier KO4BB
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike S
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2008 5:43 AM
> To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
> Subject: Re: [time-nuts] H
Thanks folks for all your efforts.
It turns out I was right about the 10811. My replacement 10811 fixed the fault
but as Chuck pointed out I was being to much of a cowboy with the course
adjustment. Instead I tuned the course control of the 10811 to a reference 5
MHz on the bench and then plugg
At 10:48 PM 5/10/2008, Tom Van Baak wrote...
>If a piece of black tape covering the lsd would turn
>2.01 into 2.0, would that solve the problem?
Why not tape over the whole display, or better yet, just completely
avoid the cost of instrumentation and ship the DUT without testing?
_
Said,
Plotter tries to detect a number of numerical formats on its own. For
that purposes it uses a predeclared set of possible delimiters and
possible decimal separators. And it uses the presence of a
delimiter/separator as well as the absence of a delimiter/separator to
do its job. In your case
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] HP 5370B
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 06:36:26 +
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Didier Juges" writes:
>
> >> If a piece of black tape covering the lsd would turn
> >> 2.01 into 2.0, would that
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "marks twotoe.com" writ
es:
>Now, although it seems deceptively simple, I can't decide whether to tune
>the multiplier or not.
If you have a good spectrum analyser and follows the procedure, it's
not tricky at all.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Z
Hi All,
This is my first 5370B so I knew nothing about its expected behaviour.
I bought it on eBay as the song goes and when it arrived I could see damage
to the top right corner of the front frame that the operator panel screws
into.
It looked like it had been dropped and dropped quite hard.
12 matches
Mail list logo
