Poul,
That is absolutely not true ! Those CS-133's work very hard radiating from F1
to
F2 and back again at 9+ GHz !
BillWB6BNQ
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <4c72f32a.9000...@elfpen.com>, Chris Howard writes:
>
> >http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html
> >
> >
On 08/24/2010 12:16 AM, Chris Howard wrote:
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html
"It's a mystery that presented itself unexpectedly: The radioactive
decay of some elements sitting quietly in laboratories on Earth seemed
to be influenced by activities inside the sun, 93 mill
In message <4c72f32a.9000...@elfpen.com>, Chris Howard writes:
>http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html
>
>Any implication for CS clocks?
No. Cs133 is not radioactive.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
Free
>Perhaps they don't train reporters to ask good questions anymore?
Sure they do... "Is the head dead yet?"
___
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mai
If there were, we'd have noticed it by now - unless all reference
clocks are affected the same way. Then you'd have the Tree in the
Forest syndrome.
The article had some numbers in it, but none of them were the
amplitude of the change. They also didn't say if the effect was
cumulative or sinusoida
Hi
I always associated things slowing down late at night at Purdue to the
consumption of beer. Possibly their sample atoms have been out at a kegger
Bob
On Aug 23, 2010, at 6:24 PM, J. Forster wrote:
> Interesting, but neutrino catalyzed nuclear reactions have been known for
> ages.
>
> W
Interesting, but neutrino catalyzed nuclear reactions have been known for
ages.
When Flieshman and Ponds (?) reported "Cold Fusion" it was initially
advanced as a possible mechanism, but the flux was way off. It eventually
turned out to be bad science.
-John
==
>
> http://news.stan
http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/august/sun-082310.html
"It's a mystery that presented itself unexpectedly: The radioactive
decay of some elements sitting quietly in laboratories on Earth seemed
to be influenced by activities inside the sun, 93 million miles away."
Any implication for CS c
Hi,
I just got a PCMCIA GPIB card and cable on eBay. However, it seems NI
changed connectors on the card and they don't match up. Seems I have an
old style card and new style cable.
Is anybody in a similar situation and are you interested in a swap?
Best,
-John
=
__
Add C4 for doing the cutting and it's job done!
Steve
WB0DBS
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Mark J. Blair wrote:
On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Pieter ten Pierick wrote:
I would just use an axe for that, much less precise };-P
And of course for the measuring I would use a laser interferome
On Aug 23, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Pieter ten Pierick wrote:
> I would just use an axe for that, much less precise };-P
> And of course for the measuring I would use a laser interferometer based
> system, with nm precision!
I suggest replacing the chalkline with one of those inverted spray cans for
Hey,
>
> On Aug 23, 2010, at 7:52 AM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
>> Has anyone made a PIC based Have Quick device to either compare two have
>> quick outputs, generate a HQ data stream or read a HQ stream?
>
> I've been interested in playing with the HQ outputs of my HQ-compatible
> GPS receivers for a l
On Aug 23, 2010, at 7:52 AM, Brooke Clarke wrote:
> Has anyone made a PIC based Have Quick device to either compare two have
> quick outputs, generate a HQ data stream or read a HQ stream?
I've been interested in playing with the HQ outputs of my HQ-compatible GPS
receivers for a long time. It'
Hi:
Has anyone made a PIC based Have Quick device to either compare two have
quick outputs, generate a HQ data stream or read a HQ stream?
I'd like to compare two GPS receivers using their HQ outputs.
http://www.prc68.com/I/DAGR.shtml#Pol
--
Have Fun,
Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
<>___
14 matches
Mail list logo
