Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Hal Murray
If I understand you correctly, then I did not have things setup symetrically. Now I have a tee on each of the A and B inputs. The unused port on the B tee has a 50 Ohm terminator. Is this what you mean? Symmetry makes it easier to see what is going on. If you use a Tee on the B input, then

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 04/03/2011 12:40 PM, Hal Murray wrote: If I understand you correctly, then I did not have things setup symetrically. Now I have a tee on each of the A and B inputs. The unused port on the B tee has a 50 Ohm terminator. Is this what you mean? Symmetry makes it easier to see what is going

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Mike S
At 09:42 PM 4/2/2011, Joseph Gray wrote... I'm reading 18.9 ns. The coax specs give a VOP of 66%. This should calculate out to a length of 3.74 M. When I measure the coax, I get 3.8 M. Your calculation is incorrect. If the velocity factor only has 2 significant digits, the result of the

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Joseph Gray
Thanks again to everyone who replied. I obviously have much more to learn about this topic. I will do some reading and more experimenting. The comments so far have put me on the right track. Joe Gray W5JG ___ time-nuts mailing list --

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread David C. Partridge
With any decent TDR you can SEE all the connections so you can measure the cable length (+/- a few mm) directly. Regards, David Partridge -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Magnus Danielson Sent: 03 April 2011 12:46 To:

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 04/03/2011 09:33 PM, David C. Partridge wrote: With any decent TDR you can SEE all the connections so you can measure the cable length (+/- a few mm) directly. No, you can't. You can measure the electrical length. I do have a decent TDR at hand. You would have to assume the speed in the

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Bill Hawkins
For extra points, test with the same long cable at different temperatures. Say from soaking in a 150 deg F oven and a zero degree freezer. Bill Hawkins ___ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Joseph Gray
That's an interesting question. Does temperature have an effect on the dielectric that changes the VOP? I'll have to try your experiment. Is that worth ten extra credit points? :-) The copper in the coax has a positive temperature coefficient, which will contribute to an increased impedance

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread paul swed
It does change vop On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Joseph Gray jg...@zianet.com wrote: That's an interesting question. Does temperature have an effect on the dielectric that changes the VOP? I'll have to try your experiment. Is that worth ten extra credit points? :-) The copper in the coax

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 04/03/2011 11:52 PM, Joseph Gray wrote: That's an interesting question. Does temperature have an effect on the dielectric that changes the VOP? I'll have to try your experiment. Is that worth ten extra credit points? :-) The copper in the coax has a positive temperature coefficient, which

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Joseph Gray
I assume you mean that impedance has an effect on VOP? Can you point to any internet sources that explain this effect? Preferably something not overly technical. Joe Gray W5JG On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 4:11 PM, paul swed paulsw...@gmail.com wrote: It does change vop

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Brent Gordon
Hi Joe, Both VoP and impedance depend on relative permittivity (dielectric constant). See the section Derived Electrical Parameters on Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coaxial_cable Brent On 4/3/2011 4:37 PM, Joseph Gray wrote: I assume you mean that impedance has an effect on VOP?

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Hal Murray
But, does the impedance have any effect on VOP? Not normally. It's 1/sqrt(dielectric constant * magnetic permeability) For most materials used as insulators, the magnetic permeability is 1 so we tend to drop that part. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coaxial_cable There are a couple of

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread WB6BNQ
Joe, The coax can be viewed as a series of lumped constants; that is, series inductors with many shunt capacitors to ground in between the inductors. In essence, a delay line. At standard temperature / pressure / etc. the delay line assumes a given value. If any external

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread J. Forster
Bottom line is that using a chunk of coax (even air line) as a time delay standard is like using a ruler made of a rubber band to check the accuracy of a SS maxchinist's scale. YMMV, -John === Joe, The coax can be viewed as a series of lumped constants; that is, series

[time-nuts] GPS antenna with direction orientation?

2011-04-03 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
A couple of years ago I picked up a surplus Aeroantenna choke-ring GPS antenna that I think was intended for surveying use. I finally got it installed today and noticed that it has an arrow on the bottom indicating that the antenna should be oriented with the arrow facing north. I'm trying

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Joseph Gray
John, I wasn't expecting the coax to be a precision standard. However, since you bring it up, can you recommend something that I could use as a precision standard to test a T.I. counter? Preferably something that is inexpensive and easy to make. Joe Gray W5JG On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 6:11 PM, J.

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread J. Forster
Air dielectric coax is about the best you can do, AFAIK. -John == John, I wasn't expecting the coax to be a precision standard. However, since you bring it up, can you recommend something that I could use as a precision standard to test a T.I. counter? Preferably something

Re: [time-nuts] T.I. experimenting - newbie question

2011-04-03 Thread Jim Lux
The electrical length of a piece of coax does change with temp. The Gore catalog, for instance, has a graph of it. And it has a most annoying bump right around 20 to 25 C, at least for the stuff I use at work. As to why... The length changes for one thing. I think, also, there will be a change

Re: [time-nuts] GPS antenna with direction orientation?

2011-04-03 Thread Graham / KE9H
John: Maybe it is not omni-directional. Since the satellites don't go further north than about 55 degrees, then (as long as you are in the northern hemisphere) you could reject both reflections and also any direct signal low on the northern horizon. --- Graham == On 4/3/2011 7:42 PM, John

Re: [time-nuts] GPS antenna with direction orientation?

2011-04-03 Thread Tom Van Baak
A couple of years ago I picked up a surplus Aeroantenna choke-ring GPS antenna that I think was intended for surveying use. I finally got it installed today and noticed that it has an arrow on the bottom indicating that the antenna should be oriented with the arrow facing north. I'm trying

Re: [time-nuts] GPS antenna with direction orientation?

2011-04-03 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi John: Exactly. There are about a dozen specific antennas that have been thoroughly characterized for phase center at L1 and L2. I think to the mm level. Have Fun, Brooke Clarke http://www.PRC68.com John Ackermann N8UR wrote: A couple of years ago I picked up a surplus Aeroantenna

[time-nuts] Help needed in Seattle with HP 8620C and 86242D Sweep Oscillator

2011-04-03 Thread Peter Loron
Hello! I've got a HP 8620C with a 86242D plugin (5.9 - 9.0GHz) that is in very good physical condition. The machine powers up, and I can get a sawtooth wave from the sweep out connector. The top row of knobs move the pointers in the window as they should. I don't have a network analyzer (or