On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
"J. Forster" wrote:
> I recently bought some clean IBM Thinkpads cheap with unknown Boot
> PassWords. There is a hack to access the existing PWs and rewrite them,
> but it requires connecting to an 8 pin SMT IC.
>
> I know several vendors make "Dip Clip"
Actually, it was in Nuts & Volts as well, and I was thinking about posting
a similar query to the list, but my incentive and my interest pretty much
went negative when my cursory investigation revealed that price
information appeared to be non-existent. IMHO for pretty much
*everything* that is fo
It's been like that since the first op-amps and RTL. The new devices are
all made with Nonobtanium and Administratium.
Thomas Valerio
> Actually, it was in Nuts & Volts as well, and I was thinking about
> posting
> a similar query to the list, but my incentive and my interest pretty
> much
> wen
hp_cisco...@yahoo.com said:
> One thing I am wondering about is disciplining - how much of this is HW and
> how much is SW?
> How are non-Trimble oscillators disciplined? It it common practice to
> provide a GPS antenna input?
I think you are missing the big picture.
There are two different ty
t...@westwood-tech.com said:
> information appeared to be non-existent. IMHO for pretty much *everything*
> that is for sale, if you have to ask for the price it is a scam.
Yes, when it says "call for pricing", I usually drop interest. But I
wouldn't say "scam". How about "not targeted at my
El 01/10/2012 11:22, Hal Murray escribió:
t...@westwood-tech.com said:
information appeared to be non-existent. IMHO for pretty much *everything*
that is for sale, if you have to ask for the price it is a scam.
Yes, when it says "call for pricing", I usually drop interest. But I
wouldn't say
On Oct 1, 2012, at 4:45 AM, Javier Herrero wrote:
> El 01/10/2012 11:22, Hal Murray escribió:
>> t...@westwood-tech.com said:
>>> information appeared to be non-existent. IMHO for pretty much *everything*
>>> that is for sale, if you have to ask for the price it is a scam.
>> Yes, when it says
On 9/30/12 10:51 PM, Thomas Valerio wrote:
Actually, it was in Nuts & Volts as well, and I was thinking about posting
a similar query to the list, but my incentive and my interest pretty much
went negative when my cursory investigation revealed that price
information appeared to be non-existent.
Aging eyesight, for one. For another, I don't like hacking up hardware.
And there is not a lot of access, except from directly above, and lots of
easily melted plastic nereby.
-John
==
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 18:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
> "J. Forster" wrote:
>
>> I recently bought some clea
Hello Hal and all:
Here's the answer I got:
"Don,
A single unit would set you back $465.00 and delivery would be in the
region of 6
weeks.
Best Regards
Steven Wilson (史帝文)
Technical Director
RFX Limited
Unit 11A, Oakbank Park, Livingston, West Lothian, Scotland,EH53 0TH, U.K.
Tel - +44 (0)1506
Hi
That's not a bad price for one piece.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On
Behalf Of Don Latham
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2012 12:27 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] RFX GPSDO
That isn't bad
Sent from my iPhone and Hunter Lambert is my hero!
On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:27 AM, "Don Latham" wrote:
> Hello Hal and all:
> Here's the answer I got:
>
> "Don,
>
> A single unit would set you back $465.00 and delivery would be in the
> region of 6
> weeks.
>
> Best Regards
> Ste
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Don Latham wrote:
> A single unit would set you back $465.00 and delivery would be in the
> region of 6
> weeks.
I Wonder what price the T-Bolts sold for new in single quantities.
Maybe more than $465?
Chris Albertson
Redondo Beach, California
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:10 PM, John Pease wrote:
> Don
>
> Latham's law of horizontal surfaces states "Any bare horizontal surface
> immediately becomes covered with junk."
>
>
> I would offer a more general law:
>
> A N dimensional surface tends to attrack N+1 dimensional objects to the
> sat
Well over 1000. Can still buy them
Sent from my iPhone and Hunter Lambert is my hero!
On Oct 1, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Don Latham wrote:
>
>> A single unit would set you back $465.00 and delivery would be in the
>> region of 6
>> weeks.
>
Hello all -
I Wonder what price the T-Bolts sold for new in single quantities.
Maybe more than $465?
I ran across this some time ago -
Perhaps someone has a better number but the later ones seem to
go for $ 1500 for the kit with the antenna from a distributor. Note that
this is a later mode
BTW this device is not nearly as good as a thunderbolt. Closer to that
gpstcxo development kit that Jackson Labs is offering (HPSDR guys are using
it I think). The short term and long term stability quite frankly doesn't
appear to be in the same league as the Thunderbolt although someone would
ne
I asked for a quotation to one spanish distributor about a year ago. It
was quoted at 977 EUR for a single unit, for the newer Thunderbolt E.
$465 seems not bad for that unit.
Regards,
Javier
El 01/10/2012 18:53, Chris Albertson escribió:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Don Latham wrote:
I do not but could easily imagine in the new range they are with power
supply antenna warranty etc. I know my $139 china purchase has been one of
the best deals in a long time. That was about a year ago. So I do not think
thats a crazy number for brand new.
Other will let me know how wrong I am.
Re
Hi All,
thanks to John's superb free Timelab software, I tried ADEV for the
first time, after having been mostly interested in phase noise yet.
I learned that ADEV sensitivity is limited by the 500 ps resolution of
the counter that leads to a noise floor of 5E-10 at 1 sec, going down to
5E-1
On 10/01/2012 10:31 PM, Adrian wrote:
Hi All,
thanks to John's superb free Timelab software, I tried ADEV for the
first time, after having been mostly interested in phase noise yet.
I learned that ADEV sensitivity is limited by the 500 ps resolution of
the counter that leads to a noise floor of
> I was wondering why the resolution in TI mode is so much limited, since
> I never had any problems measuring 5 or 10 MHz frequencies with up to 12
> figures on that counter.
Limited? The question is not so much counting the figures but asking if the how
much the figures count.
> As a quic 'n
As you've found, time interval counters by themselves can't measure
Allan Deviation to the levels required for today's precision oscillators.
Here are three google searches - either a general search or search the
Time Nuts archive at www.febo.com. They will get you started in the
topic of All
On 10/01/2012 11:13 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
I was wondering why the resolution in TI mode is so much limited, since
I never had any problems measuring 5 or 10 MHz frequencies with up to 12
figures on that counter.
Limited? The question is not so much counting the figures but asking if
the how m
> I was wondering why the resolution in TI mode is so much limited, since
> I never had any problems measuring 5 or 10 MHz frequencies with up to 12
> figures on that counter.
If you look closely you'll see that the 53132A resolution drops by a factor of
ten (to 11 digits per second) when then
>Just saw this mentioned in Circuit Cellar, just wonding if it really
>exists, how much they are asking, and if anyone has played with one
>yet?
>
>http://www.rfx.co.uk/pdfs/GPS_OCXO_1300_10_module.pdf
It is small enough to incorporate in the external antenna !
Raj
___
Are LightSquared still trying to get some value from their contributions?
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/10/lightsquared-still-wont-give-up-on-spectrum-near-gps-band/
http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?do=main.textpost&id=a2a98f9f-beae-4642-9ba0-a1874805f024
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2
27 matches
Mail list logo
