On 11/28/2013 03:28 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
> On 11/28/13 1:35 AM, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
>>
>> Hello Time-Nuts community,
>>
>> I'm interested in the simulation of oscillator noise (especially in
>> discrete event simulators).
>>
>>
>> PS: When I use the word oscillator I mean the cheap quartz
>> osci
Jim,
On 11/29/2013 07:27 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
> On 11/29/13 8:50 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
>> On 11/29/2013 04:11 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
>>> On 11/29/13 5:56 AM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Unfortunately that was a contribution from Magnus in 2010
(see www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2010-Ap
On 11/29/13 8:50 AM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
On 11/29/2013 04:11 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
On 11/29/13 5:56 AM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Unfortunately that was a contribution from Magnus in 2010
(see www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2010-April/046932.html )
that I have simply reported without verifyin
On 11/28/2013 08:18 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:35:33 +0100
> Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
>
>> I'm interested in the simulation of oscillator noise (especially in discrete
>> event simulators).
>> I came across this topic as part of the literature research for my master's
>> th
On 11/29/2013 04:11 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
> On 11/29/13 5:56 AM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
>> Unfortunately that was a contribution from Magnus in 2010
>>
>> (see www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2010-April/046932.html )
>>
>> that I have simply reported without verifying the link and found that
>> link
On 11/29/13 5:56 AM, Azelio Boriani wrote:
Unfortunately that was a contribution from Magnus in 2010
(see www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2010-April/046932.html )
that I have simply reported without verifying the link and found that
link unusable after sending the message. My best guess is th
Unfortunately that was a contribution from Magnus in 2010
(see www.febo.com/pipermail/time-nuts/2010-April/046932.html )
that I have simply reported without verifying the link and found that
link unusable after sending the message. My best guess is this:
http://www.crya.unam.mx/radiolab/recurso
Thank you all for the comments, articles and numbers on real opamp setups -
I find it really helpful.
On 24 November 2013 17:29, Bob Camp wrote:
> Hi
>
> Switch over to 60Hz power and I’ll bet those spurs move to 120Hz.
>
> Anything with a rectifier in it can produce (but may not produce) nas
On 11/28/13 6:27 AM, Chuck Harris wrote:
As far as I know it is L1 only. It is a Bullet II HE, P/N 25045-10,
the standard antenna specified in the Thunderbolt manual.
If you look closely, you will notice that what appears to be a
single soldered joint at the middle, is really two solder joints,
I'm now wading through the GPS data I logged to see if anything happened at
the time of the jumps. Will post once I find something.
On 29 November 2013 15:35, Stephan Sandenbergh wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have now redone the original experiment (same settings), and this time
> round no jumps at all
Wolfgang,
A colleague of mine wrote this simulator based on a multirate filterbank:
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5461653&queryText%3Dm+brooker+phase+noise
Since you are in the academia I'd assume you'll be able to access it?
Cheers,
Stephan.
On 28 November 2
Hi All,
I have now redone the original experiment (same settings), and this time
round no jumps at all. Strange. This means I cannot reproduce what I
originally measured, making it all the more difficult to hunt down the
issue with certainty.
Thank you for the good advice thus far. For future mea
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:35:33 +0100
Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
> I'm interested in the simulation of oscillator noise (especially in discrete
> event simulators).
> I came across this topic as part of the literature research for my master's
> thesis, and have to admit that I really underestimated h
Ciao,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:03:06 +0100
Azelio Boriani wrote:
> http://horology.jpl.nasa.gov/papers/FlfmSimPtti.pdf
This host has ceased to exist. Can you tell us the title of the
paper and the names of its authors?
Attila Kinali
--
1.) Write everything down.
2.) Red
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 08:32:58 -0800
Jim Lux wrote:
> What's interesting is that this is NOT a crossed dipole, at least from
> what I can see. It looks like all 4 arms are connected to the same point
> at the top. So it's some sort of funky folded monopole
The generic helical antenna is just a f
On 11/28/13 1:35 AM, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
Hello Time-Nuts community,
I'm interested in the simulation of oscillator noise (especially in discrete
event simulators).
PS: When I use the word oscillator I mean the cheap quartz oscillators as found
in typical consumer electronic stuff.
PPS:
As far as I know it is L1 only. It is a Bullet II HE, P/N 25045-10,
the standard antenna specified in the Thunderbolt manual.
If you look closely, you will notice that what appears to be a
single soldered joint at the middle, is really two solder joints,
one on each of the sides of the preamp's
On 11/27/13 11:21 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 04:02:53 -0800
Jim Lux wrote:
[Crossed dipole antennas]
I don't know how they do the phase quadrature.. do they
make one dipole a bit longer and the other a bit shorter?
Yes. Same principle as with patch antennas.
Yes, but on
Hello Wolfgang,
lots of interesting reading about oscillator noise:
http://rubiola.org/index.html
There are also some phase noise related publications from Ulrich L. Rohde:
http://www.tu-cottbus.de/fakultaet3/de/fakultaet/institute/stiftung/prof-dr-ing-habil-dr-hc-mult-ulrich-l-rohde/technical-p
Spotted this:
http://www.eso.org/public/announcements/ann13092/
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetenc
20 matches
Mail list logo
