Lesson learned. Will not use the tiny URLs again.
On Kickstarter and Indigogo you pay thru PayPal and get the money back if it
doesn't fund.
Of course, I'm the guy that put $500 non-refundable down on a car where the mfg
hasn't even built the plant!
http://eliomotors.com
N0UU
__
On 16/01/14 20:29, Hal Murray wrote:
anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.com said:
The real benefit of dual-frequency is you can do post-processing with PPP.
Javad has some modules but they start at 3 kUSD - if anyone knows of hobby
level priced L1/L2 receivers that can produce rinex-files for PPP processi
anders.e.e.wal...@gmail.com said:
> The real benefit of dual-frequency is you can do post-processing with PPP.
> Javad has some modules but they start at 3 kUSD - if anyone knows of hobby
> level priced L1/L2 receivers that can produce rinex-files for PPP processing
> that would be interesting!
FYI: I got an email reply from Art Sepin at Synergy with several helpful
documents, which he did not post himself on time-nuts out of concern for
seeming too commercial. Apparently they will go up on the Synergy website for
the official launch of the SSR product line this June. But trusting tha
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:16 AM, John Beale wrote:
> The one datasheet I could find (nothing on the mfr's website!?) says this
> part can talk in three different formats including UBX Binary:
> P/N 16062133G SSR-6Tr ROM based, w/PIC, Mot Bin, UBX Bin, NMEA, No Battery
>
I found that the 133G di
Looking at this graph:
http://www.thinksrs.com/assets/instr/PRS10/PRS10diag2LG.gif
If you have a good PRS10, it only needs adjusting on the many-hours
timescale?
How much better is a dual-frequency receiver going to be for this, compared
to a single frequency receiver?
The real benefit of dual-fre
Paul
It weighs 30 lbs. Pictures are on face book or I can email with an address.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: paul swed
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:20 PM
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] fast edge, rise time.
Bill
Interesting a
Hi. I have an assembled TAPR TAC board with the matching 1pps Motorola GPS
and documentation that I would like to trade for a working GPSDO +/- cash
depending. If you have a spare good GPSDO (smaller is better) and want to
play with an old classic kit that is no longer available, lets discuss.
I was happy to find the one-off $35 deal for the SSR-6Tr from Synergy
Systems is still on, and I got mine yesterday. It works OK using Motorola
WinOncore12 to talk with it, in Motorola Binary format, and the performance
does seem better than the Oncore M12+ I was previously using (eg. smaller
a
1/sqrt(7) = 0.37796...
sqrt(2)/2 = 0.707...
-Chuck Harris
Tom Van Baak wrote:
The 1.4 scale factor correction worked
Nice confirmation.
The actual number is sqrt(2). Look at the definition of ADEV
(http://tf.nist.gov/images/adevfreq.gif) to see why.
Note sqrt(2) = 1.414 and 1/sqrt(7) is 0.
It's ok, even preferred, to use real URL's (many of us don't make a habit of
clicking on t.cn links).
The link is:
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/navspark-arduino-compatible-with-gps-gnss-receiver
/tvb
- Original Message -
From: "Alberto di Bene"
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 20
Don't know what happened... my previous message was relayed with an almost
empty body...
Here it is again.
73 Alberto I2PHD
=
On 1/14/2014 8:05 PM, lstosk...@cox.net wrote:
/This isn't drawing lots of attention, but really
> The 1.4 scale factor correction worked
Nice confirmation.
The actual number is sqrt(2). Look at the definition of ADEV
(http://tf.nist.gov/images/adevfreq.gif) to see why.
Note sqrt(2) = 1.414 and 1/sqrt(7) is 0.707. The rule-of-thumb is that ADEV(tau
1 day) is 0.707 the daily drift rate; wh
13 matches
Mail list logo