Re: [time-nuts] New NIST Time Code to Boost Reception for Radio-Controlled Clocks

2014-05-31 Thread Alexander Pummer
here is a description how a receiver works for a time signal with very similar modulation http://caxapa.ru/thumbs/417284/Engeler_DCF77.pdf 73 KJ6UHN On 5/31/2014 2:23 PM, paul swed wrote: I had reached out several times to the new wwvb chip maker for this timecode. And though first run chips we

Re: [time-nuts] Beginner question - unexpected possible jitter in 1 PPS output of Motorola ONCORE UT+ module

2014-05-31 Thread Chris Albertson
I posted here some days ago an admission that I did exactly this by accident once. It is a very hard problem to debug because everything works just fine, except for the very high jitter. So I go looking for noise and what not.The problem was a wrong number of inverters. On Sat, May 31, 201

Re: [time-nuts] Beginner question - unexpected possible jitter in 1 PPS output of Motorola ONCORE UT+ module

2014-05-31 Thread Jean-Louis Oneto
Hello, The UT_Eng_Notes file I have (for the UT, not the UT+) specify: 1PPS Signal Description . 0 to 5 V pulse . Pulse accuracy: - Normal mode: < 130 ns (one sigma) with SA on - Position-hold mode: < 50 ns (one sigma) with SA on . Rise time from 0 to 5 V is approximately 20 to

Re: [time-nuts] New NIST Time Code to Boost Reception for Radio-Controlled Clocks

2014-05-31 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The price of the spin isn’t just the cost of the masks. There’s a non-trivial cost involved in the redesign of the chip and the testing that finds the problem. You can indeed do a project run for $5,000 and get usable chips. The same process moved to a single wafer also can give you a few

Re: [time-nuts] New NIST Time Code to Boost Reception for Radio-Controlled Clocks

2014-05-31 Thread Jim Lux
On 5/31/14, 5:48 PM, Bob Camp wrote: Hi A thousand chips at $1 a chip is a very different thing than a thousand chips at $100 a chip. The next issue might be that they only have them in die form. The issue after that probably is that you really want the version 3 (or 9) chips that actually wo

Re: [time-nuts] New NIST Time Code to Boost Reception for Radio-Controlled Clocks

2014-05-31 Thread Bob Camp
Hi A thousand chips at $1 a chip is a very different thing than a thousand chips at $100 a chip. The next issue might be that they only have them in die form. The issue after that probably is that you really want the version 3 (or 9) chips that actually work with all the modulation schemes. I’v

Re: [time-nuts] New NIST Time Code to Boost Reception for Radio-Controlled Clocks

2014-05-31 Thread Scott Newell
At 04:23 PM 5/31/2014, paul swed wrote: And though first run chips were available they are not to us unless we want 1000 of them. Also pricing is unclear. If they don't have distribution set up yet, I can understand 1k min orders...but no samples? That said yes the intent is to receive tim

Re: [time-nuts] New NIST Time Code to Boost Reception for Radio-Controlled Clocks

2014-05-31 Thread paul swed
I had reached out several times to the new wwvb chip maker for this timecode. And though first run chips were available they are not to us unless we want 1000 of them. Also pricing is unclear. That said yes the intent is to receive time. The new chip doesn't easily allow a way to d-psk the signal.

Re: [time-nuts] Beginner question - unexpected possible jitter in 1 PPS output of Motorola ONCORE UT+ module

2014-05-31 Thread Tom Van Baak (lab)
Check rising/falling edge times, check trigger levels, check signal levels and load. Are you DC or AC coupled. How about power supply noise and grounding? Which edge are you actually triggering on? Is there crosstalk with the Tx line. It is extremely unlikely that there's a problem with the UT+

Re: [time-nuts] Beginner question - unexpected possible jitter in 1 PPS output of Motorola ONCORE UT+ module

2014-05-31 Thread David Feldman
Picked this project back up this afternoon after couple of weeks, narrowed the problem down but not solved. Refresh: My ONCORE UT+ module appears to have very extreme jitter (on on order of 100 uSec, not nSec random variation between leading edges of successive pulses) in the 1 PPS output. I a

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB paper in May 2014 IEEE communications...

2014-05-31 Thread Bob Camp
Hi We are in a “brave new world” of industry / government interaction. Watching how it plays out with WWVB (through real product) probably will provide a number of people with research topics for years to come. Yes it’s frustrating, a lot of it is as new to them as it is to us. I’m willing to c

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB paper in May 2014 IEEE communications...

2014-05-31 Thread Steven Kluck
I have been able to consistently receive the WWVB phase-modulated data of what is now being referred to as "Normal Mode" since last summer, using an air-wound coil antenna, multiple op-amp front end, and a PIC microcontroller setup that I originally used for receiving the amplitude-modulated signal

[time-nuts] New NIST Time Code to Boost Reception for Radio-Controlled Clocks

2014-05-31 Thread Brooke Clarke
Hi: What are the left two digits telling us? http://www.nist.gov/pml/div688/wwvb-030513.cfm I've emailed John Lowe & James Burrus the above question and for more information about the different transmission modes as well as more information about the hardware shown on the above web page. -- H

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB paper in May 2014 IEEE communications...

2014-05-31 Thread Bob Camp
Hi They tested the modulation format they now are using back in 2013. If they also tested the other formats that was done for a very brief period of time. I would think that knowing the transmission schedule of the various formats would be an important input into the chip’s design. More or less

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB paper in May 2014 IEEE communications...

2014-05-31 Thread Scott Newell
At 08:01 AM 5/31/2014, Bob Camp wrote: Hi Well that's a bit more information. We seem to be missing the deployment schedule on the other new modulation formats. I kind of doubt that the watch and clock guys are going to start the fabs turning out millions of chips until they can test all the

Re: [time-nuts] Caveats on Allan Deviation with ultra stable oscillators

2014-05-31 Thread Henry Hallam
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Always locate your DUTs physically orthogonal to each other. Good point. Of course, if you have more than three in an ensemble then the ensuing hyperdimensional vortex may also cause unexpected cross-coupling. Henry ___

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB paper in May 2014 IEEE communications...

2014-05-31 Thread Alexander Pummer
and here is a more detailed description of a similar signal's demodulation: http://caxapa.ru/thumbs/417284/Engeler_DCF77.pdf On 5/31/2014 1:03 AM, David I. Emery wrote: Well the actual details of the WWVB modulation and time codes are now published. Was just leafing through som

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB paper in May 2014 IEEE communications...

2014-05-31 Thread Bob Camp
Hi I’d say it is a safe bet that they will fiddle the way they do the various modulation formats so that the WWVB wrist watches keep working. It will be interesting to see how they do that with the “fast” modulation. I both want my watch to work and I’d like to see the fast stuff on the air for

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB paper in May 2014 IEEE communications...

2014-05-31 Thread Mike Feher
Wonder what the consequences to my Junghans watch will be? - Regards - Mike Mike B. Feher, EOZ Inc. 89 Arnold Blvd. Howell, NJ, 07731 732-886-5960 office 908-902-3831 cell -Original Message- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Tom Van Baak (

Re: [time-nuts] Caveats on Allan Deviation with ultra stable oscillators

2014-05-31 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist
will also look better than it really is, and for the same reasons. (Some people have even reported similar behavior with cesium standards, although I don't see how that could happen. There aren't supposed to be any first-order temperature effects in a CBT, and I'd think that any lower-order ef

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB paper in May 2014 IEEE communications...

2014-05-31 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Well that’s a bit more information. We seem to be missing the deployment schedule on the other new modulation formats. I kind of doubt that the watch and clock guys are going to start the fabs turning out millions of chips until they can test all the formats. …… the 100 bps signals looks i

Re: [time-nuts] Caveats on Allan Deviation with ultra stable oscillators

2014-05-31 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <5389a141.7050...@rubidium.dyndns.org>, Magnus Danielson writes: >Yeah, there is a whole bunch of environmental effects there. I haven't >mentioned the Stark effect, which is the electrostatic field effect. >See, the list grows longer. > >The closer you look, the more effects you will

Re: [time-nuts] Caveats on Allan Deviation with ultra stable oscillators

2014-05-31 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 05/31/2014 12:24 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message <013401cf7c46$31ac3cc0$9504b640$@miles.io>, "John Miles" writes: (Some people have even reported similar behavior with cesium standards, although I don't see how that could happen. There aren't supposed to be any first-order tempera

Re: [time-nuts] Caveats on Allan Deviation with ultra stable oscillators

2014-05-31 Thread Magnus Danielson
John, On 05/30/2014 10:31 PM, John Miles wrote: I usually don't use drift removal as I want to see the effects of drift! The effects of oscillators locking together are very apparent on both the phase and AD plots when using a DMTD system. There was no indications of such locking! My point wa

Re: [time-nuts] WWVB paper in May 2014 IEEE communications...

2014-05-31 Thread Tom Van Baak (lab)
http://tf.boulder.nist.gov/general/pdf/2719.pdf /tvb (i5s) > On May 31, 2014, at 1:03 AM, "David I. Emery" wrote: > >Well the actual details of the WWVB modulation and time > codes are now published. > >Was just leafing through some journals while doing some > boring system configurati

[time-nuts] WWVB paper in May 2014 IEEE communications...

2014-05-31 Thread David I. Emery
Well the actual details of the WWVB modulation and time codes are now published. Was just leafing through some journals while doing some boring system configuration here... IEEE Communications Magazine May 2014 has a paper on page 210 by Yingsi Liang, Oren Eliezer, Dinesh

Re: [time-nuts] Caveats on Allan Deviation with ultra stable oscillators

2014-05-31 Thread Hal Murray
> Always locate your DUTs physically orthogonal to each other. Unless you have 3 clocks. (and everybody knows what happens if you only have 2) >From an old time-nuts message (Mar, 2009) > Allied to this discussion is the Loomis effect, discovered by the > American millionaire who had three S